>While one side of the unipolar world government agenda was driven by a view that the USA should forever be the primary global police force governing a zero sum system of perpetual war, with an unelected elite managing the system from above, the other side believed that the USA should surrender its claims to sovereignty to an international global body with unelected technocrats and financiers at the top managing the zero sum system of perpetual war from above.
Good insight.
That explains something I've been puzzling over - why there was a tooth and claw battle between GW and Owl Gore in 2000. I had previously thought they were pretty much joined at the hip, so why the hanging chads kerfluffle, other than circem et panem? It seemed bloodier than required for that, and Owl Gore seemed to lose a lot of status over it. People on the left laughed at him in the MSM, even.
So this hypothesis seems to point to Bush et al as the "US as primary global police force party", and Gore et al as the "global technocrats party."
TY