Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 19, 2020, 8:44 a.m. No.11705658   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5706

BAKER NOTABLE

>>11704969

Barkeep gets sanctimonious

>>11705261

Anon baits

>>11705332

Baker knows which BV I'm talking about, the one that deleted ebot. Also doubles down on the "wise separation of BV and Baker structure"

>>11705372

Anon posts evidence.

>>11705442

BV won't respond to evidence until goaded.

>>11705450

BV claims to be Anon, despite being busted.

>>11705552

BV still acting like a homo to deflect from being busted.

>>11705562

Anon goads BV into responding again.

>>11705581

BV claims evidence posted earlier was never sauced.

>>11705612

Anon wonders how to interpret "Thanks for the warning, can delete everything again" sauced in >>11705372

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 19, 2020, 8:50 a.m. No.11705699   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11705691

BAKER NOTABLE

>>11704969

Barkeep gets sanctimonious

>>11705261

Anon baits

>>11705332

Baker knows which BV I'm talking about, the one that deleted ebot. Also doubles down on the "wise separation of BV and Baker structure"

>>11705372

Anon posts evidence.

>>11705442

BV won't respond to evidence until goaded.

>>11705450

BV claims to be Anon, despite being busted.

>>11705552

BV still acting like a homo to deflect from being busted.

>>11705562

Anon goads BV into responding again.

>>11705581

BV claims evidence posted earlier was never sauced.

>>11705612

Anon wonders how to interpret "Thanks for the warning, can delete everything again" sauced in >>11705372

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 19, 2020, 8:58 a.m. No.11705757   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5803

>>11705706

>How come I don't have a You next to the post you accused me of making?

Is that seriously your defense?

>Ip AdDrESSes NEveR ChAnGE

It'd work if you didn't admit it >>11676870

 

>>11704969

Barkeep gets sanctimonious

>>11705261

Anon baits

>>11705332

Baker knows which BV I'm talking about, the one that deleted ebot. Also doubles down on the "wise separation of BV and Baker structure"

>>11705372

Anon posts evidence.

>>11705442

BV won't respond to evidence until goaded.

>>11705450

BV claims to be Anon, despite being busted.

>>11705552

BV still acting like a homo to deflect from being busted.

>>11705562

Anon goads BV into responding again.

>>11705581

BV claims evidence posted earlier was never sauced.

>>11705612

Anon wonders how to interpret "Thanks for the warning, can delete everything again" sauced in >>11705372

>>11705706

BVBakers defense is there is no (You) on a post 30k posts old, doesn't address evidence.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 19, 2020, 9:09 a.m. No.11705823   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5839

>>11704969

Barkeep gets sanctimonious

>>11705261

Anon baits

>>11705332

Baker knows which BV I'm talking about, the one that deleted ebot. Also doubles down on the "wise separation of BV and Baker structure"

>>11705372

Anon posts evidence.

>>11705442

BV won't respond to evidence until goaded.

>>11705450

BV claims to be Anon, despite being busted.

>>11705552

BV still acting like a homo to deflect from being busted.

>>11705562

Anon goads BV into responding again.

>>11705581

BV claims evidence posted earlier was never sauced.

>>11705612

Anon wonders how to interpret "Thanks for the warning, can delete everything again" sauced in >>11705372

>>11705706

BVBakers defense is there is no (You) on a post 30k posts old, doesn't address evidence.

>>11705803

BVBakers uses Shaggy's "Wasn't me" defense, it's not terribly effective in the face of a clear admission.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 19, 2020, 9:13 a.m. No.11705850   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11705839

>Make sure to filter the truth goyim

 

>>11704969

Barkeep gets sanctimoniou

>>11705261

Anon baits

>>11705332

Baker knows which BV I'm talking about, the one that deleted ebot. Also doubles down on the "wise separation of BV and Baker structure"

>>11705372

Anon posts evidence.

>>11705442

BV won't respond to evidence until goaded.

>>11705450

BV claims to be Anon, despite being busted.

>>11705552

BV still acting like a homo to deflect from being busted.

>>11705562

Anon goads BV into responding again.

>>11705581

BV claims evidence posted earlier was never sauced.

>>11705612

Anon wonders how to interpret "Thanks for the warning, can delete everything again" sauced in >>11705372

>>11705706

BVBakers defense is there is no (You) on a post 30k posts old, doesn't address evidence.

>>11705803

BVBakers uses Shaggy's "Wasn't me" defense, it's not terribly effective in the face of a clear admission.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 19, 2020, 9:23 a.m. No.11705901   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5953

Personally, I think what's really curious is this "fight" between midnightriders and the current BVBaker when it looks like BVBaker bakes on midnightriders. https://web.archive.org/web/20201119171233/https://www2.qanonbin.com/trip/fEd7imYA7aU7

 

Weird coincidence I guess.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 19, 2020, 9:59 a.m. No.11706151   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11706064

 

Twitteerfags: DM @IsItWetYet if you want to contact the team doing the work CM did before. I suspect they are quite capable and prob aware and investigating already. Annoying to have to tend to whining anons while putting time in to investigate attacksโ€ฆ