Twitter Locks Out Tom Fitton Over Accurate Tweet About Efficacy of Masks Exposed in Massive Danish Study

Twitter locked out Judicial Watch boss Tom Fitton on Wednesday for a completely accurate tweet about the efficacy of face masks.

Tom Fitton was citing a massive Danish study published this week confirming face masks do not work and may be dangerous.

Twitter will not let Tom Fitton back on the platform unless he deletes his accurate tweet (screenshot below).

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/twitter-locks-tom-fitton-accurate-tweet-efficacy-masks-exposed-massive-danish-study/

Weapons Of Mass Deception

One of the most-watched documentaries on Netflix right now is The Social Dilemma, an exposé of how Big Tech is manipulating our thinking and behavior in ways both grand and minute. And most of the time, we’re completely oblivious to it.

These companies prey upon the weaknesses in our cerebral programming; using our anxieties, our hopes, and our brain’s craving for dopamine to shepherd us into performing actions desired by their advertisers — whether it’s consuming certain content, buying certain products, or voting a certain way.

This is a massive social issue that we’re only beginning to become aware of as a society. How much more control do these companies wield over our thoughts and behavior than we currently realize? How much is acceptable? How do we protect ourselves going forward?

Addressing and attempting to “unwire” ourselves from their programming efforts won’t be easy — as any parent who has tried to wean their child off of social media for even a few days (or hours!) already knows.

But as big of an issue as this is, it’s not new, nor is it limited to the Tech sector. Marketers and politicians have been intentionally exploiting our evolutionary wiring for decades, in order to influence us to do their bidding.

The Psychology Of Persuasion

One of the best books explaining the psychology behind this manipulation is by Robert Cialdini.

It’s a remarkable book. I highly recommend everyone read it in order to understand the vast minefield of psychological traps being set for us on a daily basis.

Cialdini begins the book by revealing how all animal species, humans included, have evolved stereotypical behavioral “shortcuts” to certain stimuli. We’ve done so because life is (increasingly) complex, and these standardized responses convey an evolutionary advantage.

At least they used to.

Cialdini refers to these fixed-action patterns as the click, whirr effect. When they’re triggered, it’s as if a button has been pressed in our brains (click!) that then causes us, robot-like, to perform a standard sequence of behaviors (whirrr!).

Click! Spot a potential predator? Whirr! Increase heart and breathing rates, dialate pupils, tense up muscles, secrete adrenaline, prepare to fight/flee.

That kind of pre-programmed automatic response served our hunter-gatherer ancestors well. Those with a strong click, whirr response to predators survived at a higher rate than those without.

But especially in today’s modern world, far from the African savannas early humans evolved upon, many of these fixed-action patterns don’t convey the same advantages. In fact, they can be exploited against us.

The Turkey And The Polecat

A good non-human example of this is a study conducted by animal behavioralist M.W. Fox in the 1970s.

Mother turkeys have a very strong click, whirr response to polecats. A polecat is a type of weasel, who loves eating turkey chicks. So when a mother turkey sees a polecat, even a stuffed one held by a researcher, she flies into a berserker rage, doing her utmost to claw and peck the intruder to death.

But a mother turkey also has a strong click, whirr response to the “cheep, cheep” sound her chicks make. When she hears it, she goes into nurture mode: feeding, tending, warming and cleaning them.

It is so strong, in fact, that it overpowers her programming against the polecat predator. As mentioned, when a stuffed polecat is placed in sight, she will attack it viscously instantly. BUT, if a recorder is placed inside the stuffed polecat that reproduces the “cheep, cheep” of a chick, the mother turkey will completely change her behavior. Instead of attacking, she will start nurturing the polecat; huddling it alongside her chicks and trying to feed and clean it.

Her natural pre-programmed defense against the polecat has been hacked. And she now acts in its best interest, not her own.

https://patriotrising.com/weapons-of-mass-deception/

UN World Food Program Warns Of "Famines Of Biblical Proportions In 2021"

The UN World Food Program was the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize in 2020, and the head of that agency is warning of the potential for absolutely devastating famines around the globe in 2021. The COVID-19 lockdowns that were instituted all over the world this year created tremendous hardship in many wealthy countries, but in poorer nations the economic devastation has created alarming waves of hunger. There was hope that things would get better when lockdowns were being lifted, but now a new round of lockdowns is being imposed, and many experts are warning about what this could mean for those living in deep poverty.

David Beasley was absolutely thrilled when his agency was given the Nobel Peace Prize, because all of the attention has given him more opportunities to ask for money. Because without a massive influx of money, he says that we are going to see “famines of biblical proportions in 2021”…

The head of the World Food Program says the Nobel Peace Prize has given the U.N. agency a spotlight and megaphone to warn world leaders that next year is going to be worse than this year, and without billions of dollars “we are going to have famines of biblical proportions in 2021.”

As I have previously explained to my readers, widespread crop failures along with the economic shutdowns brought on by COVID-19 have put a tremendous amount of stress on global food distribution systems. Food prices are rapidly rising all over the planet, and this is hurting the people at the bottom of the economic food chain the most.

According to Beasley, many areas of the globe are potentially facing a major food crisis “in the next three to six months”…

According to a joint analysis by WFP and the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization in October, 20 countries “are likely to face potential spikes in high acute food insecurity” in the next three to six months, “and require urgent attention.”

Of those, Yemen, South Sudan, northeastern Nigeria and Burkina Faso have some areas that “have reached a critical hunger situation following years of conflict or other shocks,” the U.N. agencies said, and any further deterioration in coming months “could lead to a risk of famine.”

Here in the United States, the good news is that nobody is facing starvation at this point.

But the bad news is that we are in the midst of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression of the 1930s, and some Americans are waiting in line for up to 12 hours for handouts. If you don’t believe this, here is an excerpt from a news report about a food distribution event that just happened in Texas…

Thousands of families lined up to receive groceries at a Texas food bank this weekend, some queuing for as long as 12 hours as the on-going coronavirus pandemic continues to inflict hunger and economic hardships on the state.

The food bank distribution event, held by North Texas Food Bank (NTFB) in Dallas on Saturday, saw 600,000 pounds of food given away – including 7,000 turkeys.

You have to be pretty desperate to be willing to wait in a line for 12 hours.

But when you are very hungry and you are very short on money, all of a sudden you will be willing to do things that you wouldn’t normally do.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/un-world-food-program-warns-famines-biblical-proportions-2021

Here We Go Again

“Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add ‘within the limits of the law’ because the law is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual.” — Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)

As if nanny state governors had been sleepwalking through the tyrannical shutdowns and their disastrous consequences last spring and summer, as if they were ignorant of the economic destruction of those they barred from going to work or operating their businesses, as if they thought it is lawful to assault natural rights and constitutional guarantees, these same governors are now beginning another wave of interferences with personal liberty.

Slowly, over the past 10 days, while the eyes of the public and the media have been on the counting of votes in the presidential election and the ensuing allegations and litigations, governors in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Connecticut and New York have threatened to impose or have begun to impose their unconstitutional, illegal, immoral and illogical efforts to shut down society in order — they claim — to rid the land of the COVID-19 virus.

By doing so, they have reignited the age-old debate of individual liberty versus public safety. In this case, the safety they claim to be enhancing is safety from disease. Yet, by their executive orders, they have purported to use state law to interfere with freedoms without due process that are guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. By doing that, they have set themselves up for criminal prosecutions when normalcy returns.

Here is the backstory.

For the past four years, I have been working on a 650-page treatise that explores the origins of human freedom from a natural law perspective. The book traces the recognition by scholars, jurists, theologians and, in the case of America at its founding, radical revolutionaries like Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, who truly believed and passionately argued that human freedom — our individual power to make unobstructed choices — comes from within us, and not from the government. Most of the historical defenders of this truism also believed in God and argued that He made us free by giving us free will.

This understanding of natural rights was wedded to the United States at its birth in 1776 when Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence that we are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights, and again in 1791 when Madison wrote in the Ninth Amendment that because human liberty is so expansive the government must protect even unstated, unenumerated rights.

To protect our rights from whom?

The framers could easily answer that question, yet the folks who run the government today do not want it asked because the answer implicates them. In the revolutionary era, colonists could protect themselves from evildoers attempting to steal their property or take their lives. But the foe they most feared was the government. They fought a bloody war against the government of King George III because it assaulted their economic rights and their right to self-government.

There is no pandemic exception to the Constitution. It is liberty that flows in our veins, not false promises of government safety.

https://patriotrising.com/here-we-go-again/

THE KRAKEN: Sidney Powell Says Campaign Has Evidence Dominion, With Communist Money, Stole Election From Trump

Trump attorney Sidney Powell dropped a series of bombshell allegations today, promising evidence of systematic Democrat voter fraud

Trump attorney Sidney Powell dropped a series of bombshell allegations during today’s “Path to Victory” press conference with Rudy Giuliani. Powell promised upcoming evidence in court that software and money originating from Communist Venezuela, Cuba and China had fixed the 2020 election for Joe Biden.

Powell had previously hinted in an interview with Fox Business’ Lou Dobbs that she was about to “Release the Kraken” on election irregularity and voter fraud in the 2020 election.

Her statement started off with a bang:

What we are really dealing with here, and uncovering more by the day, is the massive influence of communist money through Venezuela, Cuba and likely China in the interference here with our elections in the United States.

The Dominion voting systems, the Smartmatic technology software and the software that goes in other computerized voting systems here as well, not just Dominion, were created in Venezuela at the direction of Hugo Chavez to make sure he never lost an election after one constitutional referendum came out the way he did not want it to come out.

Powell specifically alleged is that Smartmatic, a voting software system which originated in Venezuela and was imported to Florida after the 2000 election, is in fact linked to the Canadian company Dominion Voting Systems.

Furthermore, that they both share software designed to allow end-users to rig elections; software which was exported from Venezuela to various Latin American countries to allow easy vote-rigging by left-wing autocrats.

In statements on their websites, Smartmatic and Dominion Voting Systems both denied allegations that they were in any way affiliated or that their products shared any “software, hardware or other technology”.

Notably, the Dominion executives are nowhere to be found now. They are moving their offices overnight. Their office in Toronto was shared with one of the Soros entities; one of the leaders of the Dominion project – Lord Mark Malloch-Brown – is Mr. Soros’ #2 person in the UK and part of his organization.

As American Jewish magazine Tablet reported in 2018, Hungarian-born American investor George Soros was then-credited with roughly $32 billion in lifetime spending on political activism through his Open Society Foundations (OSF), making him likely the most generous political donor in world history.

By comparison, today’s record-holder for most generous living philanthropic donor on Earth is Bill Gates, who has given $35.8 billion to charity.

Soros is credited by many with single-handedly providing the infrastructure for democratic reform and anti-corruption efforts in former Soviet states, but has also faced increasing criticism from conservatives in the past two decades over accusations that he personally funds the worst of the Radical Left in the United States.

The OSF funds a byzantine network of activist entities ranging from the fairly benign to the extreme far-left. OSF also works closely with a number of technically-unaffiliated groups and corporations who have strong bonds in the form of repeat business and shared employees.

But one of its most characteristic features is its ability to flip votes. It can be set to run an algorithm that probably ran all over the country to take votes from President Trump and flip them to Vice President Biden.

https://nationalfile.com/the-kraken-sidney-powell-says-campaign-has-evidence-dominion-with-communist-money-stole-election-from-trump/

DATA: Trump Won 95% Of Bellwether Counties, Making Biden Win Statistically Improbable

Trump campaign official Steve Cortes crunches numbers on bellwether counties, and the improbable nature of Biden's purported victory

In a video posted to Twitter on Thursday, Trump 2020 Campaign Senior Advisor for Strategy Steve Cortes took a deep dive into the 2020 election data regarding President Donald Trump’s overwhelmingly dominant performance in the United States’ bellwether counties, adding to the statistical improbability of a Joe Biden electoral victory.

“Out of 3,000 counties in this country, there are 19 that have a perfect track record since 1980 of voting for the successful presidential candidate,” Cortes noted. “Donald Trump, on November 3, won 18 out of these 19 counties. Could these bellwether counties really have gotten it wrong all at the same time?”

The corporate media has largely been unable to explain Trump’s dominant performance in bellwether counties, offering up only vague references to “more racially diverse populations” in response to the counties’ sharp contrast with a purported Biden victory.

“Let’s look at these individual counties,” Cortes continued, and took a look at Vigo County, Indiana, which has only failed to vote for the projected winner once in over 100 years.

Cortes noted that in 2008, “Obama won this swing county in Indiana by 16 percent. This election, Donald Trump almost exactly flipped that even by the number. He won it by 15 percent.”

More on the statistical case against a Biden win — bellwether counties. Here’s the data…#ChalkTalk pic.twitter.com/zvfI3Nq8RI

— Steve Cortes (@CortesSteve) November 19, 2020

Valencia County, New Mexico, has held a perfect track record in presidential elections since 1952.

“It’s a majority Hispanic county, working-class place,” Cortes said. “In 2008, Obama won it by 8 percent. Again, like Vigo County, it flipped it almost exactly. In 2020, Donald trump won it by 10 percent.”

Cortes added that while the bellwether data does not conclusively prove Trump won, when viewed in its totality alongside “the growing statistical evidence that points to the utter improbability of the Biden win, what emerges is really just two scenarios: either Biden had literally a perfect political storm on November 3 – highly unlikely – or there was massive and systemic cheating. And I believe the evidence grows toward the latter.”

Cortes concluded by noting one other data point: Republicans won 27 out of 27 tossup house races in 2020, meaning a Biden win in the presidential election would stand out as such as a statistical anomaly that it would willingly suspend disbelief.

https://nationalfile.com/data-trump-won-95-of-bellwether-counties-making-biden-win-statistically-improbable/

WISCONSIN RECOUNT: Out Of 176 Recount Workers, Only 58 Are Republican

With the two most Democrat leaning counties being recounted Democrats re-examining the ballots outnumber Republicans 2 to 1

In one of the most outrageous and lopsided politically partisan acts of the 2020 General Election, the Wisconsin Elections Commission has seated 118 Democrats to the 176 recount poll worker positions giving access to just 58 Republicans to the process.

The Commission issued a statement Wednesday announcing that it will engage in a recount effort in just two Wisconsin counties, Milwaukee and Dane. Milwaukee County is home to its namesake city, Milwaukee, and Dane County is home to the state capital, Madison.

Milwaukee and Dane counties are both the most populated counties and the most Democrat-leaning.

The decision to execute the recount, which is not mandatory in the State of Wisconsin no matter how close the race results are, was arrived at after the Trump campaign paid a $3 million dollar filing fee. A full recount for the state would have cost the Trump campaign in the neighborhood of $8 million.

According to Jim Hoft at the GatewayPundit, one Republican officer from Dane County said, “Only 12 out of 176 names submitted by the Republicans were accepted by the commission as recount workers.”

Since pressure has been applied by the public toward this overt exercise in partisanship, the Wisconsin Elections Commission upped the number of Republicans by 46, decreasing the ratio from 41:3 to 2:1.

UPDATE: Thanks to Our Gateway Pundit Readers — Wisconsin Increases Number of GOP Recount Workers from 12 to 58! via @gatewaypundit https://t.co/EIEgdEllft pic.twitter.com/ms0C5qPdJO

— Jim Hoft (@gatewaypundit) November 19, 2020

As it stands, Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden leads President Trump in Wisconsin 49.6 percent (1,630,673) to 48.9 percent (1,610,065). A difference of less than 1 percent of the votes cast.

With a ratio of 2 to 1, the recount, paid for by the Trump campaign, will be done predominantly by Democrats with scant Republican oversight.

https://nationalfile.com/wisconsin-recount-out-of-176-recount-workers-only-12-are-republican/

China again blames Australia for diplomatic spat, issues warning to Five Eyes intelligence partners

China has reiterated its claim that the Morrison Government is solely to blame for deteriorating relations between Beijing and Canberra, while scolding Australia and its Five Eyes intelligence partners for criticism over the erosion of democratic norms in Hong Kong.

Key points:

Chinese diplomats leaked an extraordinary list of grievances with Australia this week

The Federal Government has rebutted Beijing's claim that Australia is solely to blame for worsening ties

China has reacted angrily to Australia's comments on Hong Kong and a new defence pact with Japan

"We have said many times that the root cause for the deteriorating China-Australia relations is Australia's repeated wrong acts and remarks on issues concerning China's core interests," said foreign affairs ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian during a routine press conference on Thursday.

Chinese diplomats in Canberra gave a list of 14 grievances to Nine newspapers this week.

The document cited Australia's calls for an inquiry into the origins of the coronavirus pandemic, speaking out on widespread allegations of human rights violations in Xinjiang, and the introduction of foreign interference laws.

It also expressed anger over negative coverage of China in Australian media.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison told Sky News on Thursday that: "These are things that are fundamental to who we are as a country and if that is the cause of tension with China, then clearly Australia being Australia cannot be considered a point of tension."

"Australia is not seeking to make an enemy of any country, least of all I'd say China," Mr Morrison said.

Responding to Mr Morrison's comments, Mr Zhao said the heightened tensions were the result of Australia's "provocative and confrontational actions". For months, Trade Minister Simon Birmingham has been unable to engage his Chinese counterpart over sanctioning of Australian exports.

"The Australian side should own up to the crux of the matter, take China's concerns seriously and adopt concrete actions to correct their mistakes," Mr Zhao added.

Taking aim at Five Eyes

Beijing also hit out at Western powers' criticisms of its approach to Hong Kong, claiming it was an attack on China's sovereignty.

"The Chinese people will not provoke troubles, but we never flinch when trouble comes our way," Mr Zhao said.

"No matter how many eyes they have, five or ten or whatever, should anyone dare to undermine China's sovereignty, security and development interests, they should be careful they don't get their eyes poked blind."

He was responding to a statement delivered by Australia and its Five Eyes intelligence partners — the US, UK, New Zealand and Canada — condemning the disqualification of pro-democracy politicians in Hong Kong.

The UK maintains that the move represents a further violation of the Sino-British Joint Declaration, under which Britain handed sovereignty of Hong Kong to China in 1997, guaranteeing the city greater autonomy under the "one country, two systems" policy.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-11-20/china-blames-confrontational-australian-government-for-spat/12902774

House Democrats Block Small Business Aid Extension for 40th Time

House Democrats on Thursday blocked a Republican motion to extend small business aid for the 40th time since August.

House Democrats blocked a motion that would have allowed the House to vote on a bill to extend the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). By advancing the Previous Question on Thursday, Democrats prevented the House from considering Rep. Steve Chabot’s (R-OH) legislation, H.R. 8265, which would reopen the PPP.

Chabot said on the House floor on Thursday that small businesses need the extension of the PPP, explaining:

A recent NFIB survey indicated that over half of small business owners expect to seek additional financial assistance over the next year. If they can’t access that help, they may be forced to lay off employees or cease operations.

…

That is unacceptable. Because we can help them. We have a program that has already supported 50 million jobs all across this country. It even has over $130 billion dollars ready to go.

…

Instead of quickly passing a bill to reopen the program, Democratic leadership has used it as a political football for over three months, while small business owners had to drain the last of their funds to stay in existence and continue to pay their employees. And they nervously check if they can make payroll for the next month.

…

If we defeat the previous question, which is before us now, we can move directly to a legislative package that includes my bill to reopen and improve the Paycheck Protection Program.

.@RepSteveChabot on why Democrats should join Republicans to reopen the Paycheck Protection Program:

"We have a program that has already supported 50 million jobs all across this country. It even has over $130 billion dollars ready to go." pic.twitter.com/DSH4Us2xHV

— Mark Bednar (@MarkBednar) November 19, 2020

The Democrats’ blocking of a PPP extension arises as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told CBS 116 days ago that “we can’t go home without” a bipartisan deal on coronavirus aid.

REMINDER: Speaker Pelosi 67 days ago:

CBS’ Margaret Brennan: “Will you stay in session until a deal is negotiated?”

Pelosi: “We can’t go home without it” pic.twitter.com/TSLl0MyXbQ

— Mark Bednar (@MarkBednar) October 1, 2020

https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2020/11/19/house-democrats-block-small-business-aid-extension-40th-time/

WHO Advises Against Use of Gilead's Remdesivir as Coronavirus Treatment

Remdesivir is an antiviral medication developed by biopharmaceutical company Gilead Sciences. The drug is approved in some countries for the treatment of COVID-19. In October, Remdesivir became the first coronavirus treatment approved in the US by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

On Thursday, the World Health Organization (WHO) advised US doctors against using Remdesivir as a treatment for COVID-19 patients, saying that there is "no evidence" that the drug shortens recovery time.

“After thoroughly reviewing this evidence, the WHO GDG expert panel, which includes experts from around the world including four patients who have had covid-19, concluded that remdesivir has no meaningful effect on mortality or on other important outcomes for patients, such as the need for mechanical ventilation or time to clinical improvement,” the group wrote in a press release.

https://sputniknews.com/world/202011201081216907-who-advises-against-use-of-gileads-remdesivir-as-coronavirus-treatment/

Rudy Giuliani: The Case for Election Fraud Being Made by American Patriots in Both Parties

President Donald Trump’s legal team held a press conference on Thursday about the election fraud that’s been uncovered — a large amount of it reported by American citizens from both major political parties who want to preserve U.S. election integrity.

“That takes us to Michigan, where there was an honest Democrat who said they were cheating,” Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s lead attorney, said to reporters at the press conference. “We’ll show you her affidavit, because I know you keep reporting, falsely, that we have no evidence.”

“That we have no specific acts of fraud,” Giuliani said. “That’s because the coverage of this has been almost as dishonest as the scheme itself.”

“The American people are entitled to know this,” Giuliani said.

Giuliani said that the press should not lie about what the investigation has revealed so far, including that it is Americas coming forward to share their stories of election fraud.

“You don’t report to them that a citizen of this country, a very fine woman, who is willing to allow me to give you her name…” Giuliani said. “I can’t give you all these affidavits, because if I do these people will be harassed, they will be threatened.”

But some were willing to make their affidavits public, including Jessie Jacob, who works for the city of Detroit.

“She was assigned to voting during in September,” Giuliani said. “She was trained, basically, trained to cheat. She said, ‘I was instructed by my supervisor to adjust the mailing date of these absentee mail-in packages to be earlier than when they were sent.’”

“The supervisor made that announcement for all workers to engage in that fraudulent practice,” Giuliani said. “That’s not me saying that. The’s an American citizen saying that under oath.”

Giuliani also said this same woman said she saw election workers illegally coaching people on whom to vote for.

He told reporters much of the evidence is public and reporters can review it online, including the Michigan case, Constantino v. City of Detroit.

“All you’ve got to do to find out if I’m misleading you at all is to look at the lawsuits,” Giuliani said. “Look what’s alleged, look at the affidavits.”

Giuliani said that while not all affidavits have been made public, citizens have provided hundreds of them.

https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/11/19/rudy-giuliani-the-case-for-election-fraud-being-made-by-american-patriots-in-both-parties/

Removal Order Upheld Against Tennessee Man Who Served as Nazi Concentration Camp Guard During WWII

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/removal-order-upheld-against-tennessee-man-who-served-nazi-concentration-camp-guard-during

Employee of Government Contractor Pleads Guilty to Fraud and Kickback Charges

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/employee-government-contractor-pleads-guilty-fraud-and-kickback-charges

Pennsylvania Court Invalidates 2,349 Absentee Ballots in Allegheny County Where the Voter Did Not Date Their Declaration

A Pennsylvania court on Thursday invalidated 2,349 absentee ballots in Allegheny County where the voter didn’t date their declaration.

Commonwealth Court Judge P. Kevin Brobson on Thursday reversed a lower court judge and directed the “Elections Board to exclude the challenged 2,349 ballots from the certified returns of election for the County of Allegheny….”

“…[There] is an obvious and salutary purpose behind the requirement that a voter date the declaration. The date provides a measure of security, establishing the date on which the elector actually executed the ballot in full, ensuring their desire to cast it in lieu of appearing in person at a polling place. The presence of the date also establishes a point in time against which to measure the elector’s eligibility to cast the ballot, as reflected in the body of the declaration itself,” the judge wrote.

Judge Brobson said the votes in question will not be counted “because the votes are invalid as a matter of law.”

The judge said the terms are set by the General Assembly and warned that the real danger to our democracy is leaving it to each county board of election to decide what laws must be followed and what laws are optional.

“Such a patchwork system does not guarantee voters an “equal” election, particularly where the election involves inter-county and statewide offices. We do not enfranchise voters by absolving then of their responsibility to execute their ballots in accordance with law.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/just-pennsylvania-court-invalidates-2349-absentee-ballots-allegheny-county-voter-not-date-declaration/

More on Pennsylvania – Another Statistical Analysis Shows Roughly 300,000 Biden Votes Are Questionable

Last week we produced an article which provided evidence that the election results in Pennsylvania included results which were almost impossible. Today we received another report covering the Pennsylvania election results which supports our initial reporting and provides more information.

We reported last week that there were anomalies in Pennsylvania’s data after the 2020 election. President Trump won in a landslide on Election day with roughly two votes to every one Biden vote. The President won some counties by 80% of the vote. These results are reasonable to anyone who drove through Pennsylvania in the weeks and days before the election. Wherever you went, Trump signage was everywhere.

Then with roughly 75% of the vote counted the state began counting mail-in ballots. In this process there President received a consistent variance of his election day landslide across almost all counties. By the time they were done, Biden had somehow gained such a high portion of the mail-in ballots that he then lead the race. The pattern we identified in how he got there was almost impossible.

We now have come across another statistical survey of the results in Pennsylvania. We cannot provided the full content of this study at this time but we can share a summary of the results which complimented our article from last week posted above.

Several nationally recognized statistics experts were asked to examine the 2020 Pennsylvania voting records, and to identify anything they deemed to be statistically significant anomalies. These experts were asked to work independently and then their efforts were compiled.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/pennsylvania-another-statistical-analysis-shows-roughly-300000-biden-votes-questionable/