wtf this video is age-restricted now
chock full of pertinent information
anon notes pt1:
Episode 1, 10/1 2pm EST with L Todd Wood and George Eliason…
Information Operation
They Went After Trump Within 48 Hours of Losing Election
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ficae6x1Q5A
Interview with Source on Electronic Vote Fraud
360,162 views •Streamed live on Nov 5, 2020
CDMedia 6.21K subscribers
Host L Todd Wood reveals the mechanics behind the electronic vote steal operation in an interview with powerful source.
Russell Ramsland
group specializes in cyber operations
also does physical security
accomplished people, letter agencies
disenchanted with what saw under Obama admin
commercial firm
involved in election system, logs from activist
Dallas, TX election 2018 so-called "blue wave"
logs: concerned, how could this possibly be?
tracking journey 2yr
self-funded internal investigation
Summary of Findings
-
2002 HAVA [Help Americans Vote] Act
counties don't run elections anymore
gave billions $ states to redo election system
contract with private companies to run your elections
no standards for security
no transparency no supervision
-
air-gap myth. voting co's own manuals show this
-
foreign-owned servers outside contry, they are the last ones to control
so-called "unofficial" votes -but eventually control "official"
unofficial/official behind the same firewall
"my guys can easily go from the unofficial to the official"
-
no sec standards (ex NIST) to certify election software
-
SoS [Secretraries of States] don't understand what they're doing
-
software so bad and so porous, anyone wishing to hack and change votes can change audit trail
-
cannot go back forensically - have to catch in real-time
Nov 14, 2018 - examination of 2018 General Election
1137-pg log from Dallas county central tabulation system
bogus voter roles, bogus voters ->
polling station equpipment hacked / defectively designed ->
[^= VOTER FRAUD: usual area of concern - becoming a smokescreen]
"it is really out there and it is going on in massive amounts -
the polling station equipment can really be hacked, I had a guy
sit in a car outside a polling station in his car and in 3min he
was inside the polling station equipment using his cellphone -
so all that's real - but that's not what we're talking about today."
focus: central counting tabulation & server
where your vote goes
-remote computing capabilities that compiles/distributes votes
"they can redistribute the votes and they can reupload them"
= ELECTION FRAUD: new area of concern
Evidence of Tampering?
compare audit log error messages for Dallas and Bexar
abnormal activity
Central Accumulator Error Message (Post L&A) / Dates Occurred in Dallas / 847 Pcts Dallas / 768 Pcts Bexar (San Antonio)
"Time Stamp Mismatch" / 11/5&7 / 1741 / 1502
"Update & stop checking" / 11/5&7 / 2 / 13
"CREATE LOG IMAGE LOG FAILED" / 11/6 / 3 / 0
"Collect Audit Data failed" / 11/6 / 3 / 0
"CREATE EVENT LOG FAILED" / 11/6 / 12 / 0
"CLEARED VOTING TERMINAL AUDIT DATA" / 11/6 / 6 / 0
"Votes exceed ballots" / 11/5&6&7 / 1027 / 0
"DATABASE RESET" / 11/3&4 / 2 / 0
"Precinct already updated" / 11/6&7 / 160 / 18
"REPLACED" (Election Day) / 6-Nov / 96 / 1
Repeated "COLLECT AUDIT DATA FROM COMPACT FLASH" / 11/5&6 / 4 / 1
Dallas vs San Antonio (Bexar county): same co [ES&S] running election
San Antonio very very blue, hypothesis: logically only 1 race they'd mess with (Ted Cruz v. Beto O'Rourke), shouldn't see much
but should see a lot going on in Dallas. "our concern was true"
1027 times "votes exceed ballots" = you have loaded more votes for candidates than ballots actually cast!
between early voting / election day, saw warning 1027 times
each time NOT 1 vote, can be 20-30x
never appeared in San Antonio log
hard DB reset
early voting: votes d/l from precincts. force regenerate, entire db reset, then reload somewhere else from NOT original data
saw 2x in Dallas - never in San Antonio
"preinct is already updated" operator ES&S didn't care, yolo update it anyway
"REPLACED" - 96x in Dallas, entire precincts replaced
"COLLECT AUDIT DATA FROM COMPACT FLASH" - not original data sticks from precincts, something different. 4x
initial assessment: not looking good