>>11714605 (pb)
Not a married, Anon, huh? "Wifely duties", indeed. Kek!
>>11714255 (pb)
Hooray!
One step closer to that herd immunity!
Thanks, Bakes!
If Krugman is against something, I am for it. No decent economist believes his bullshit. He is good for drunken rants on NYTime and blaming us for his kiddie pron files on his computer.
https://www.cbronline.com/cybersecurity/paul-krugman-scam/
Guess that bitch needs to douche.