The voting machine servers from Europe quite possibly have:

1. Vote switch counts by precinct for the last decade or more. You would need to retain these data in order to develop algorithms and to quantify your accomplishments and value-add to those who control you.

1. Emails. It’s possible they openly discussed their operations both internally and, less likely, externally. But if they had direct email exchanges with known Democrat operatives (and no Republicans) and the Dem operatives give instructions or directives, this will all be over very quickly.

1. Predictive models by precinct that incorporated the need for ballot stuffing to augment vote switching. If these two efforts were both necessary to win any district, then both initiatives would need to calibrate their efforts with the other. That requires reports, power points and model performance calculations.

Combined, these would essentially be written confessions.

>>11715305 pb

>A1 Shredding and Recycling, Incorporated

i was expecting bonfires, like at the houston chinese embassy

was that the reason dems had expected to win texas, before the eviction and bonfire?

>>11716283

“general assembly”, not “house”

also, “commonwealth”, not “state”

>>11715992

they brought the whole corrupt temple down