>>11722156

To some extent, truth over facts works both ways.

Certainly, it is better to use quality facts to spread, but many people get started on their journey into the dark realms of government and society from something fake and gay.

How many people learned about real interesting things about "ufo"s in spite of (if not because of) the disinformation campaigns spreading fake and gay stuff (bob lazzar)?

War is a dirty affair.

If I were to share something like that, I would certainly include it under a caption of plausible doubt. I'm not sharing it to say it proves my belief - I am asking if it is accurate or stating that it is unreal.

Select the arsenal and vector appropriate for the mission and theater.

>>11722201

Sometimes, we are more imaginative and intelligent than our opponents, so we learn new things and, rapidly applying those things to our adversaries' objectives, create a much better plan than said adversaries could have ever crafted.

… Minus the logistics.

My concerns with the vaccines mostly pertain to the "side effects."

Who do you turn to if you find out you were rendered sterile by "accident?"

There are other possibilities if we want to go more tinfoil with regard to tampering with the transcriptase processes and other such things - but that seems like it would be short lived.

Plus - the first time around could be harmless. "See, nothing bad happened. Stop being crazy and do as you're told next time."

If I were planning this, that is how I would work it.

I'm still not getting the vaccine, and will probably turn militant against attempts to distribute locally - but it would not surprise me in the slightest to find out the first pandemic omg vaccine is completely harmless (and questionably effective) just to gaslight everyone.