>or if you want to see them, you know where to find them it doesn't need to be here.
I see. So who made you the arbiter of where and when things should or should not be seen?
>gee, even when I admit over reach you can't let go.
>introspective and direct, I make you want to keep going with it?
>try someone else.
If you werent such a self absorbed elitist pile of shit, you would have noticed the different ID.
>you wouldn't have ip hopped
Once again showing what a huge narcissist you are in thinking anyone here would need other ID's to make a comment to, of all people, YOU. Get over yourself junior, nobody is hopping ip's to be able to respond to you.
> I get you that angry because I say that you should not post that shit because it's promoting an unhealthy idea of women as objects?
You have exactly zero effect on me in any emotional or financial or spiritual way. That your juvenile inability to see beauty for beauties sake just shows how completely insecure you are with yourself.
>what I see are porn
Should have stopped there. Already you have lost as now you cannot enjoy the Sistine Chapel, the statue of David, or many other works of art such as those. You are calling things porn that simply arent. That you want to drag a poorly formed puritanical point of view through here, of all places, means you are also shunned in your real world and others find you as distasteful as you show yourself to be here.