>>11725840

more unhealthy image of a woman

no hair,

too puffed up

looks like a toy doll

she's naked near an open window in view of people outside . . .

whatelse?

ah, the unhealthy obcession with the auburn hair color from a bottle.

some people are so obcessed about pretending to be blond that they die the hair of their children . . .

but you will either call me a . . . . . . or say 'its chan culture'

and I will say: it's an unhealthy obsession and disrespectful to people to constant post those fake looking hairless hormone induced images.

>>11725882

speaks in platatudes about his obsession under a strong delusion. If she were a healthy girl she wouldn't let her self be used as the image is used. She wouldn't have done the photo shoot.

she wouldn't have undergone full body hair removal.

she wouldn't be posed as a prostitute near an open window.

picture of health?

the idea of needing that kind of picture is most unhealthy.

even more unhealthy to push it constantly on others as if a damaged (severly demaged) 'hobby' of making bait-girl photos is somehow ok.

>>11725898

perhaps the above is hyperbolic?

I should take my own advice.

Am I a hypocrite for saying the above?

My main objection is the use of it for constant reminding people about sex, which is the purpose of it in the chan. In fact if that's what she's about that's her deal and in her 'world' of fashion modeling she might thing it's OK to show off like that.

so ya, I' go overboard.

>>11725936

I already did a slight retraction of my hyperbolic statement.

the main point: the constant reminder about sex is over the top and constant.

tasteful photos ought to be kept in private.

or if you want to see them, you know where to find them it doesn't need to be here.

see this which I wrote upon reflection of my earlier bombast.

yes, you triggered me.

>>11725926

>>11725959

blonds or parent of blonds

the dark haired darked eyed guy might be a father of blonds . . .

so . . .that preference is often misguided.

PS: the dark eyed raven haired cousin of blonds is just as awesome. and they aren't hunted and saught by fetish losers.

so blonds appreciate them the most.

>>11725984

gee, even when I admit over reach you can't let go.

introspective and direct, I make you want to keep going with it?

try someone else.

my point: the fetish of hair less body and a particular hair color ignores the person, and is a bad way to choose a mate or a friend.

and you have to make a real person who says this outloud a villain?

the fetish for a hair color or a body type is fine for a person that's what they want.

but if it's the 'slaver photos' of fetish masters (who are all slaves too, to someone) then it's tiring and I use the world 'should' not as dictator but as a wise person.

you only put those girls here to keep the conversation at crotch level.

that is my main objection to them

so what do you say to that which isn't just an insult of me or trying to make me 'feel' a bit 'hurt'.

PS: if you have no ascrenment about where things should or should not be seen, then your in no position to go on about what I said.

>>11726069

the problem has nothing to do with the women or even the images, the problem is posting them here so that they always make people think constantly about that one thing.

why would you think that she's a bad girl?

I already said I gave a hyperbolic response.

you treating her as an object for sale, and posting her images here wihtout her permission is what I object to.

>>11726086

you wouldn't have ip hopped if you were not the self-absorbed say what you know about yourself as if it applies to someone else kind of jerk that you are.

>>11726134

you . . .

you keep talking about yourself.

seriously? I get you that angry because I say that you should not post that shit because it's promoting an unhealthy idea of women as objects?

go on . . .

>>11726151

what a dolt you are.

remember: all threats are boomerangs.

you just wrote your own unpleasant future.

PS: I already told you that you project what you know abou tyourself onto me.

being against the constant posting of porn like htat here is no reason ofr some bullshit as you suggest.

but for you make a threat: you set that boomerang in motion, anon. you're the only one it effects.

>>11726165

what I see are porn mongering people trying to distract adults from the real issues of the day.

adults don't need to find porn here.

>>11726188

you make a threat and ask if I'm drunk?

that's some deep-mud stupid.

you might actually be wondering into quicksand.

when the boomerang comes back to you maybe if you hide in the quicksand you won't get smacked so hard with it.

>>11726208

OK: if that were ther eason someone were interested in you would you find that as an unhealthy obcession or would you rather that they see you not as the 'auburn beauty'?

>>11726224

so you get it. . .

>>11726267

you get the boomerang.

that's a horrible way to die, but you chose it for yourself . . .

I hope it doesn't happen to you but . . . only you get to decide.

>>11726459

conjecture to suppose, understanding that they'd have to be monsters if this were true:

they want it to know how to kill people easier.

they want to use it to craft poisons that only work on certain genetic combinations

>>11726566

you've done it now . . .

all those young men who you've triggered . . .no wonder the board seems slower . . .

>>11726609

how about news without the talking heads that are really fashion models?