I'm expected to believe this Pavuk session has the military grade bandwidth, by itself, to take down a mitigation service? And I'm the dumbass?
You either don't know anything about computers or you're making shit up to confuse people who don't. You should have just pretended that /mnr/ hired a botnet. You don't have to have any proof of that happening either, but it's less retarded than your story.
They need to constantly invoke the "comms" boogeyman so it looks like they're fighting something on the board's behalf.
Speaking of digging a ditch, explain what a buffer overflow is and how it was used by the code in that bugtracker to attack a remote server instead of the Pavuk script itself.
I'm not even a good coder and I can tell you are lying. That code is an exploit that works against the Pavuk script. It does not enable Pavuk to massively attack a remote server. At best, it could be used against a Pavuk script to turn the server into a single node in a botnet. Holy shit. Learn a tiny bit about how computers work.
But your Pavuk story is such an insult to the intelligence of anyone who knows the least bit about computers that I feel they deserved to know about what you're trying to do.
But I did figure it out. Your story doesn't make sense. None of it makes sense. A single Pavuk server isn't going to be able to harm Vanwanet without massive bandwidth, and the exploit pointed out only allows Pavuk to be used to run arbitrary code on its own machine. Really, I'm insulted that you expect anyone here to believe you.
He was just joking. I hope.