>>11728900 pb
>BAKERS ARE JUST ANONS WHO BAKE THE BREDS
Not a new branch of the Assassins cult?
;)
>>11728923 pb
>I baked for the first 2 years of Q, over 500 breads until the discord cult took over and forced out all anon bakers
Where's your proof?
All i've ever seen are unproven accusations.
That's not sauce.
Neither anons nor bakers accept posts as notable wo/sauce.
Why is the standard we use for deciding what's notable so different than the standard we use when it comes to evaluating accusations about bakers union, /comms/ conspiracies, and unproven charges of board sabotage?
Next time some divisionfag makes a claim like this, ask him for really good sauce. Then watch the GTFO's start to fly.