>11730544 TORONTO BANS FACE-TO-FACE SEX
KEK
WTF os this place now, HuffPo?
screenshot and article says "Consider sexual positions"
How is that in any way a ban?
It isn't
I get that notables are not endorsements
But FFS at least represent the content of the article accurately
You fucks could get hired tomorrow with the MSM with this level of material misrepresentation
CNN would be proud to have you