‘Average’ effectiveness & unexplained side effects: 7 QUESTIONS that AstraZeneca needs to answer about its Covid-19 vaccine

The drug manufacturer AstraZeneca said on Monday it would seek emergency authorization for its coronavirus vaccine with various regulators. However, it might first have to answer a number of serious questions about its jab.

The British-Swedish company, which has developed its candidate vaccine together with the University of Oxford, “will begin the submission of the clinical data to regulators around the world that have a framework in place for emergency use or conditional approval,” its spokesman said on Monday, adding that the list of the regulators that will receive the application particularly includes the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The statement came as the drug manufacturer published interim results of the vaccine’s clinical trials, which it said “showed the vaccine was highly effective in preventing COVID-19” and declaring its overall effectiveness to amount to 70 percent - much lower than 90-percent efficacy that other leading vaccine candidates showed.

Yet, some information published by the company appeared to be quite puzzling, while some data seemed to be lacking.

AstraZeneca might eventually find itself in need of answering key questions about its would-be jab as it rushed to get regulators’ approval for it.

1.Half dose or full dose?

The company’s assessment of its vaccine effectiveness in fact comes as an estimated average for two slightly different tests. AstraZeneca admitted in its Monday release that a group of volunteers initially got a half-dose jab, followed by afull one a month later. Another, larger, group got two full doses.

The first regimen showed 90-percent efficacy, although such results were based on analysis of slightly more than 2,700 volunteers. The second one, which involved almost 8,900 people, showed only a 62-percent efficacy.

https://www.rt.com/news/507829-astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-questions/

Pew study indicates leftism is LITERALLY a mental illness

Conservatives love to throw out slogans such as "liberalism is a disease" or "Trump derangement syndrome" when talking about those who adhere to a leftist worldview. Turns out, there may actually be some scientific data from Pew Research to back up those claims. The results of the study, which was conducted off a self-reported poll by Pew in March, indicated that across all races and age groups, those who identified as conservative were far less likely to have been diagnosed with a mental illness by a doctor. In the youngest bracket of 18 to 29-year-olds, 45.9% of liberals said they had received such a diagnosis compared to 20.1% of conservatives.

When filtered by race, the problem becomes even more defined. Whites who identified as "very liberal" – you know, the majority of people marching in Antifa and BLM and espousing Critical Race Theory and professing their white guilt – are twice as likely as their non-white counterparts to suffer from mental illness. As you look across to the conservative side, however, a trend appears. Not only does the amount drop from 38% to 14.8%, but the racial disparity in the results disappears. Ph.D. student Zach Goldberg took the overall data and created a chart to show how likely a person is to develop mental illness based on race and political affiliation. Once again, whites who identified as "very liberal" - AKA the majority of our nation's socialistic wokescold leftists – were far more prone to problems. "I didn't write this thread to mock white liberals or their apparently disproportionate rates of mental illness (and you shouldn't either)," said Goldberg. "Rather, this is a question that's underexplored and which may shed light on attitudinal differences towards various social policies."

Among white liberals, the most affected group were far-left women. 56.3% of white leftist women reported mental illness compared to 27.3% percent of conservative women. To be clear: I am not mocking mental illness. Anxiety, depression, and other psychological ailments are not a laughing matter. We are complex creatures with both complex bodies and even more complex souls. From a biblical viewpoint, we are also living in a fallen world where we are cursed to struggle through life and die. The problem is, the Left keeps preaching about human utopia, evolution, and everlasting life if only we get everyone on board the Woke train. It has coddled the minds of children throughout their educations and taught them that reality is subjective. When those children grow up and face the reality of a brutal, evil world and the objective truths of morality and mortality that have defined every civilization, their psyches simply break.

The sad result, apart from the destruction of civilization, is the skyrocketing increase in psychological pain and dysfunction. The antidote, we must remember, is not simply conservatism, for not all conservatives follow objective principles or moral living. Instead, I would argue, it is the Gospel truth underpinning so much of conservative thought that leads to hope and renewal. It is that nonconformity to the patterns of this world and adherence to God's Word that allows our minds to be transformed. Ah, you say, but conservatism and Christianity are not one and the same! True, but let me ask you: who was the last leftist public figure, politician or otherwise, that you heard accurately quote Scripture and implore humble obedience to God's Word? I can give you one conservative example from just today. Senate candidate John James, who referenced his faith in Christ and God's sufficient grace in his concession speech, told conservatives directly from Ephesians 6 that the fight is not against "our fellow Americans, but against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms." Were America to return to these profound truths and amazing hope, what healing would be possible indeed!

https://notthebee.com/article/pew-study-indicates-leftism-is-literally-a-mental-illness-

tldr; This vid explains the enemy General Flynn has warned us about. RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM and it's history is broken down.

Really good vid for us to understand the big picture of the enemy's tactics. Makes so much sense.

>>11791040

The best time to resist was 10 month ago.

The next best time to resist is NOW.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8986815/People-type-O-blood-likely-catch-coronavirus.html

normies LOVE science.

RIght?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-8986839/Antibody-testing-likely-undercounts-past-covid-infections-28.html

This is the game: "Coronavirus, like HIV, is a Mycoplasma (a bacteria, not a virus)": That is why a virus test comes back negative: "The CDC hold the patent on Coronavirus: The United States Army on HIV": Concomitant

infection with COVID-19 and Mycoplasma pneumoniae:

target="_blank">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7358157/ [show less]

https://patents.google.com/patent/US7220852B1/en

Coronavirus

isolated from humans InventorPaul A. RotaLarry J. AndersonWilliam J.

BelliniCara Carthel BurnsRaymond CampagnoliQi ChenJames A. ComerShannon L.

EmeryDean D. ErdmanCynthia S. GoldsmithCharles D. HumphreyJoseph P.

IcenogleThomas G. KsiazekStephan S. MonroeWilliam Allan NixM. Steven

ObersteTeresa C. T. PeretPierre E. RollinMark A. PallanschAnthony

SanchezSuxiang TongSherif R. Zaki

Current Assignee Centers of Disease Control

and Prevention CDC

https://uncoverdc.com/2020/11/26/a-personal-statement-from-general-flynn-to-america-faith-family-and-friendships/

\Anons remember this!

We have made a REAL impact throughout this all.

To the anons who have put in countless hours into our movement unveiling the unimaginable evil that we are up against, through all the digging, decoding, memes, and prayer, we could not have done this without each other.

THANK YOU ANONS!

WWG1WGA!!!

long thread to dig..

Sidney Powell Retweeted

Liberty Times & Politics

@dmills3710

Michigan Filing: Exhibit 105

Countries/Groups Involved in US Election 2020 Access/Manipulation

Belgrade, Serbia

Iran (address tied to Netherlands server)

China

Canada

HSBC Bank Canada

BMA Capital Management

DVSCORP (Chinese Domain)

Indivisible (formerly ACORN)

@SidneyPowell1

https://twitter.com/dmills3710/status/1332018002674544642

Manitoba Gives Health Commissars Draconian Powers

(left, globalist traitor, Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister took licence plates of anti-mask demonstrators and sent them fines. )

SPH, a Winnipegger, analyzes changes in legislation which

give health officials Gestapo-like powers.

Provincial fines for individuals breaking COVID-19 health orders

are set at $1,296, while fines for businesses are up to $5,000.

Time to fight the fines!

New law allows them to order you to relinquish your home or business for the purposes of a quarantine facility, order you to be immunized/vaccinated, or vaccinate your children without your consent.

On April 15th, 2020, the Manitoba provincial government put extraordinary powers into the hands of Brent Rousin, the chief public health officer.

It repealed a law 67(3) that required the health officer to get approval from the provincial health minister before he could employ special emergency measures.

Since we now know that there is very little threat from this virus, (less than 1% mortality) and it's really only killing people who are either very old or very sick, the reasonable next step would be to go back to the way things were before these unnecessary precautions were implemented, which have ultimately done far more harm than good.

But since protecting our health is not what our elected officials have in mind, as they have sold themselves and us out to the satanic elite, instead they have made visiting your neighbors illegal.

Other surprising emergency powers include clause 67(2): authority to order you to relinquish your home or business for the purposes of a quarantine facility, or if you are deemed to be "not protected against a communicable disease," order you to be immunized/vaccinated, or to refrain from working until "the risk of infection no longer exists."

If a person is merely suspected of being exposed to a communicable disease, available measures include medical exam/testing, treatment, immunization, isolation, and quarantine. 43(2).

If a person refuses any of the recommended measures of the health officer, article 47(1) allows for the application to justice for the apprehension of the person. So you can say no to the vaccine, (the health act allows for that; article 97) but doing so can result in your incarceration.

https://henrymakow.com/2020/11/MANITOBA-GIVES-DRACONIAN-POWERS.html

>>11798993

>>11799048

https://www.bitchute.com/video/p2QEYgQSAkjo/

Press For Truth on Adamson.

Only 300 deaths under 65 in Canada. What the every living fuck is this shit.

Landmark legal ruling that found Covid tests are not fit for purpose and are basically worthless (97% unreliable)

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/507937-covid-pcr-test-fail/

By Peter Andrews, Irish science journalist and writer based in London. He has a background in life sciences, and graduated from the University of Glasgow with a degree in genetics.

Four German holidaymakers who were illegally quarantined in Portugal after one was judged to be positive for Covid-19 have won their case, in a verdict that condemns the widely-used PCR test as being up to 97-percent unreliable.

Earlier this month, Portuguese judges upheld a decision from a lower court that found the forced quarantine of four holidaymakers to be unlawful. The case centred on the reliability (or lack thereof) of Covid-19 PCR tests.

The verdict, delivered on November 11, followed an appeal against a writ of habeas corpus filed by four Germans against the Azores Regional Health Authority. This body had been appealing a ruling from a lower court which had found in favour of the tourists, who claimed that they were illegally confined to a hotel without their consent. The tourists were ordered to stay in the hotel over the summer after one of them tested positive for coronavirus in a PCR test - the other three were labelled close contacts and therefore made to quarantine as well.

Unreliable, with a strong chance of false positives

The deliberation of the Lisbon Appeal Court is comprehensive and fascinating. It ruled that the Azores Regional Health Authority had violated both Portuguese and international law by confining the Germans to the hotel. The judges also said that only a doctor can “diagnose” someone with a disease, and were critical of the fact that they were apparently never assessed by one.

They were also scathing about the reliability of the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, the most commonly used check for Covid.

The conclusion of their 34-page ruling included the following: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

In the eyes of this court, then, a positive test does not correspond to a Covid case. The two most important reasons for this, said the judges, are that, “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used’’ and that “the test’s reliability depends on the viral load present.’’ In other words, there are simply too many unknowns surrounding PCR testing.

cont part 2

>>11810081

part 2

Tested positive? There could be as little as a 3% chance it’s correct

This is not the first challenge to the credibility of PCR tests. Many people will be aware that their results have a lot to do with the number of amplifications that are performed, or the ‘cycle threshold.’ This number in most American and European labs is 35–40 cycles, but experts have claimed that even 35 cycles is far too many, and that a more reasonable protocol would call for 25–30 cycles. (Each cycle exponentially increases the amount of viral DNA in the sample).

Earlier this year, data from three US states – New York, Nevada and Massachusetts – showed that when the amount of the virus found in a person was taken into account, up to 90 percent of people who tested positive could actually have been negative, as they may have been carrying only tiny amounts of the virus.

The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”

While the judges in this case admitted that the cycle threshold used in Portuguese labs was unknown, they took this as further proof that the detention of the tourists was unlawful. The implication was that the results could not be trusted. Because of this uncertainty, they stated that there was "no way this court would ever be able to determine" whether the tourist who tested positive was indeed a carrier of the virus, or whether the others had been exposed to it.

I’m an epidemiology professor and I have some genuine concerns about the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine. Here’s why… I’m an epidemiology professor and I have some genuine concerns about the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine. Here’s why… I’m an epidemiology professor and I have some genuine concerns about the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine. Here’s why…

Sshhh – don’t tell anyone

It is a sad indictment of our mainstream media that such a landmark ruling, of such obvious and pressing international importance, has been roundly ignored. If one were making (flimsy) excuses for them, one could say that the case escaped the notice of most science editors because it has been published in Portuguese. But there is a full English translation of the appeal, and alternative media managed to pick it up.

And it isn’t as if Portugal is some remote, mysterious nation where news is unreliable or whose judges are suspect – this is a western EU country with a large population and a similar legal system to many other parts of Europe. And it is not the only country whose institutions are clashing with received wisdom on Covid. Finland’s national health authority has disputed the WHO’s recommendation to test as many people as possible for coronavirus, saying it would be a waste of taxpayer’s money, while poorer South East Asian countries are holding off on ordering vaccines, citing an improper use of finite resources.

Testing, especially PCR testing, is the basis for the entire house of cards of Covid restrictions that are wreaking havoc worldwide. From testing comes case numbers. From case numbers come the ‘R number,’ the rate at which a carrier infects others. From the ‘dreaded’ R number comes the lockdowns and the restrictions, such as England’s new and baffling tiered restrictions that come into force next week.

The daily barrage of statistics is familiar to us all by this point, but as time goes on the evidence that something may be deeply amiss with the whole foundation of our reaction to this pandemic – the testing regime – continues to mount.

Communist China says all humans should be marked, tracked to prevent spread of Covid-19

Xi Jinping, the communist dictator of China and personal pal of Joe Biden, is absolutely thrilled that his country’s latest coronavirus release was a success in shutting down the world and destroying the global economy. And the next step, he says, is to implement a global QR code system to mark and track all humans, giving authoritarian governments like his own the ability to restrict travel if a person is deemed to be “infected.”

During the recent G20 meeting, a who’s who of globalist world leaders, Xi openly called for a “global mechanism” to verify the “health status” of all people on earth. In order to travel, those living in the new world that Xi envisions will have to get “permission” from the government in order to move about, much like cattle that have to be punched with ear tags before moving from pen to pasture.

By adopting “internationally accepted QR codes,” Xi contends, globalist dictators like himself would be able to easily pull up “nucleic acid testing results” on people in a hot second. Automated systems probably run by artificial intelligence (AI) would then issue either a “pass” or “fail” result depending on the “infection” status of the human cattle in question.

“We need to further harmonize policies and standards and establish ‘fast tracks’ to facilitate the orderly flow of people,” Xi stated at the elitist gathering. “[We] hope more countries would participate.”

Much like the bar codes that are currently present on food items at the grocery store, Xi’s human bar codes would be issued to all living persons, first to their mobile devices and eventually directly into their skin, presumably in either the right hand or forehead. Scanning devices would be able to read these bar codes in order to process the human cattle through the system.

Communist China already launched this type of system back in February, it turns out. Chinese human cattle are now issued traffic-light style health codes that determine whether or not they are allowed to travel. A green code means they are “free” to travel, while orange or red means that a human livestock head must first quarantine for up to two weeks.

Liberals anxious to get branded like cattle in the new world order

Part of how China determines which human cattle can travel freely and which have to stay home is largely dependent upon the communist country’s social credit score system. Human cattle that disobey the government too many times, for instance, might have a low score that prohibits them from moving about, while the government bootlickers are much higher up on the food chain.

https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/communist-china-says-all-humans-should-be-marked-tracked-to-prevent-spread-of-covid-19/

Johns Hopkins Study Saying COVID-19 Has 'Relatively No Effect on Deaths' in U.S. Deleted After Publication

Conventional wisdom is that COVID-19 has caused thousands of deaths in the United States and nearly 1.5 million worldwide. This perception has been directly challenged by a study published by Johns Hopkins University on Sunday, November 22.

Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Johns Hopkins University, critically analyzed the impact that COVID-19 had on U.S. deaths. According to her, the impact of COVID-19 on deaths in the United States can be fully understood by comparing it to the number of total deaths in the country.

According to study, “in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”

Wait, what? Really?

That’s what it says. And, it should come as no surprise that not long after the study was published it was deleted within days.

Luckily, a back-up copy remains on The Wayback Machine, and we can still read the study.

So, how exactly did the study conclude that COVID-19 has had “relatively no effect on deaths”? Here’s how the study made this determination:

After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared.

Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.

According to Briand, “The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals.”

Briand’s analysis found that the range of deaths amongst the older population has remained within the range of past years.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2020/11/27/johns-hopkins-study-saying-covid-19-has-relatively-no-effect-on-deaths-in-u-s-deleted-after-publication-n1178930

China releases wild new virus claim

Chinese scientists have made fresh claims about the origin of the COVID-19 virus, deflecting blame to another country entirely.

A team of Chinese scientists claim to have proof the COVID-19 pandemic didn't originate in China, instead researchers have pointed the blame at another country.

Scientists from the Chinese Academy of Sciences released a research paper claiming the first coronavirus cases actually appeared in India before then travelling to Wuhan.

The paper claims the source of the virus could have been from humans and wild animals sharing the same water source due to a large heatwave across India and Pakistan in 2019.

“The water shortage made wild animals such as monkeys engage in the deadly fight over water among each other and would have surely increased the chance of human-wild animal interactions.”

However, other experts have thrown doubt on these claims, calling the paper “bias” and “very flawed”.

It comes after Victoria did the seemingly impossible, and officially eliminated COVID-19 by hitting a major milestone yesterday.

It wasn’t long ago, on August 11, that there were 7880 active cases in the state, but now Victoria has hit 28 days without a single infection.

Epidemiologists say elimination is achieved after 28 days without new infections or mystery cases in the community, but Victoria has gone one better with no infections recorded at all.

https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/coronavirus-australia-live-updates-emails-show-brett-sutton-frustrated-at-hotel-bungle/live-coverage/c14e67d32952dd5de59af4958e4e4efc

>>11812078

Mass testing occurring in Shanghai and surrounding cities in China; citing "outbreak" due to cargo handlers from North America not wearing masks

Interestingly, China is beginning to also spread fear porn of the pandemic, citing outbreaks occurring in three cities.

Nov 22nd: Shanghai's airport locked down and health workers dressed in fear porn hazmat suits began to test workers in the airport.

Mass testing is occurring in the cities of Shanghai, Tianjin, and Manzhouli in China.

"Local health authorities traced the origin of the outbreak to two cargo handlers who had cleaned a container that had arrived from North America, without wearing masks."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladityaray/2020/11/23/china-launches-mass-testing-in-three-cities-chaotic-scenes-follow-at-shanghai-airport