more expendable. If Sydney is still a player she might need to be able to avoid some of the oncoming legal flak from the other side. By this distancing she will not be included so she can pursue the other avenues unobstructed. The question is more how to introduce this evidence to a court to get a legal briefing started since the official legal channels are garbage like the fbi.
it has to be something along that line. The reason Tucker pitched a fit was evidence, well most evidence is not introduced till trial as to not provide possibility for tampering and contamination. I think there is enough circumstantial evidence but we would still need a way to get it before a judge, not a lawfag but i have heard an idea of standing in the court, that some lawyers can bring cases before a court without the state introducing evidence, especially confusing because in some ways the state is the prosecutor and the defendant. I am confused. Just going to eat guac and smoke.
another thought is since the Flynn case has not been resolved that needs to be cleared because the evidence that Flynn has is in confirmation of the coup by the democrats. He is the evidence in that case.
I think Flynn is the witness she keeps talking about. Something has to connect, she is part of the case but shes defending the witness against the state which is flynn.
right, that case is still in limbo, and since we know so much does cross over, why would witnesses not cross as well. That could be the dopium talking though. It could be as simple as too much pro q talk. I think it needs to get to the supreme court but even then the military is still on the table as they are on the left saying this is potus doing a coup.
as if he was in the SCIF with potus watching the vote flipping. saw other anons talking about that earlier today i think it was.