>>11744226 (prior loaf)
>I understand
It's a 5:5, looks like.
>#KrakenOnSteroids
And she doubles down! HA.
>>11744226 (prior loaf)
>I understand
It's a 5:5, looks like.
>#KrakenOnSteroids
And she doubles down! HA.
The media are certainly smart enough to appreciate the clarification from the Trump campaign about Powell. Reporting it like she's been cut loose makes them look desperate as fuck to discredit her.
That would be pretty fucking epic.
She never was. Read the notables.
I really wonder how we will be told. A series of public exposures in court seems the most likely, but I also wonder about declassification and official addresses/etc. from POTUS.
For example, 9/11 truth. What's the most likely way for that to be disclosed to the public?
Huh. Curious.notable
I wonder if he was ever recruited by the glowboys.
I generally discourage following commentators at all, or if you do, take them with a grain of salt. The better people to listen to are those who have some kind of experience to draw from. Former "insiders," etc.
In the long run, anons are always better off doing their own thinking. Likeโฆ the Jackie Chan ofโฆ thoughtsโฆ
A lot of the individual journalists are probably dumb, but think about the editors and higher-up decision-makers. They're devious.
The cards are stacked against the truth in several ways that are essentially part of human nature. It's an uphill battle.