>>11744762 (lb)
>>11744834 (lb)
>DO NOT post this to twitter or you will get your account locked.
We'll see if my subtle camouflage works. Kek.
>the url on the bottom doesn't have any camo though.
true. tweet still up 18 mins later… 2 whole RT's. I think URL is small enough and might be partly obstructed by red lines below.
Maybe I'd have been better off with something like this.
>you should cut off that warning if it doesn't get eaten.
if I lose my twt acct for 12 hours, no biggie. Kinda wanted it there for people to see the censorship we're up against.
I'd need to play around with that site a little.. no familiarity, but I see what you're getting at. I'm kinda old-school (only because I can make most things from scratch). Here's some varying opacity versions of that shredded paper overlay for anyone interested.
nice.
This brings up a question for me. I have a moderate-size twt acct w/ 10K followers and a couple throw-away twt accts with 200 followers.
Does it make more sense to tweet from one of the barely-used "200" accts and then RT with the larger account for more audience? Would only the originating acct get locked? Guessing so.
good point.
I used to not believe in reincarnation, as a Bible believer, b/c of "it is appointed unto man once to die, and then the judgement." Hoever, I no longer see the two as necessariily mutually exclusive.