Anonymous ID: 72af2c Nov. 22, 2020, 7:54 p.m. No.11746367   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6483 >>6556 >>6658

RE:Sidney Powell and getting critical info past big tech BAN HAMMERS / OP request

 

reposting from end of last bread

 

>>11744760 PB

 

>>11745112 PB

 

an anon posted a variety of techniques in the last few months to avoid the twitter/fb ban hammer with and still post VERBOTEN links.

 

Primary were the link shorteners like t.co and embedding the link in a graphic. The image linked above of the pic of the sindney powell link should work.

 

We are in the home stretch here guys, final push. cant afford to be on the sidelines bacause of bans.

 

I will see if i can dig up the orig post that had a few more techniques and post it up.

 

request to notable this shit and also post of any success or failures with getting past the twit/fb ban hammers with the gnews link.

 

lets rally the troops and make this an op instead of trading nightshift and frog graphics tonight. we're here for a reason. we've been choosen for a reason.

Anonymous ID: 72af2c Nov. 22, 2020, 8:05 p.m. No.11746483   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6504

RE:Sidney Powell and getting critical info past big tech BAN HAMMERS / OP request

 

>>11746367

 

still looking for the helpful anon post from the not too distant past that was a pretty good list of ways to avoid the ban hammer with links. haven't found it yet. if any other anon remembers said list, or even has som e suggestions here, please help! please post it!

 

another techniques i just remembered was to post verboten links to the wayback machine of the actual verboten link

 

the wayback machine link to the link that sidney powell posted is here-

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20201123034641/https://gnews.org/577635/

 

sidney powell, one of top warriors in the fight has been sidelined, lets jump in here and help

Anonymous ID: 72af2c Nov. 22, 2020, 8:26 p.m. No.11746658   🗄️.is 🔗kun

RE:Sidney Powell and getting critical info past big tech BAN HAMMERS / OP request

 

>>11746367

 

additional note about using the wayback machine to share verboten links and still avoid the ban hammer:

 

If fb or twitter ends up banning the wayback machine link to the verboten link that you've been sharing, often there are multiple captures for the page you are trying to share.

 

The Sidney Powell gnew banned link's page is here, with 7 captures and counting-

 

https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://gnews.org/577635/

 

if one is banned, which i havent seen happen yet, you could just start sharing a different wayback machine capture, with a different address of the same original gnews (or whatvere) link