Get rid of the gnews.org link and it will allow the contents of the article to be posted.
For now, at least.
Facebook applies an image-to-text algorithm and gnews.org is banned. If you use a picture with the website url in the frame it will kick it back.
It's not the picture - it's the text in the picture, in this case the gnews.org is flagged in their system because it's anti-China.
Probably interferes with edge detection algos and hashing thereby.
Their algo likely processes edges as splines and then uses some hashing on those splines to create an indexed search. The organic and colorized shapes likely get processed as separate splines/features, but the grayscale blocks likely merge to form different splines within the algo, meaning it is more probable to defeat it.
You could try using a water/wave distortion on text that faceberg has blocked. Perferably one which has an irreversible pattern (IE - if you ran the filter in reverse you would not get proper text). This way a human could understand but the computer's algo would have trouble with it.
Wingdings would be fucking hilarious.
But no one has really trained themselves to use it. It's a simple substitution cypher so at some point someone would catch on and then patch the algo.
Never was much a fan of the Penguin.
They wanted a fifth generation replacement for the F-16 and F-18 light fighters.
What they got is…. A flightless bird worse than the F-105.
Not… Really?
It never really satisfied its mission it was contracted for. Generals had this idea it would be a game changer and be able to swoop in supersonic past defenses, blow things up, and zip out.
Forgetting that a plane loaded down with external ordnance does not typically slip right on through the sound barrier.
The overall design had rather high wingloading and this made it rather subpar for its class in air to air combat. It wasn't as bad once ordnance was jettissoned, but if you had to discard your bombs to be your own fighter escort… You just voided the mission.
The F-35 falls into that same trap where they want to supplement the low numbers of F-22s to replace the aging F-15C anf eventually F-15E component, as well as the F-16 component while reducing readiness requirements for the A-10.
And that is just too many roles to try and stuff into such a small airframe. They would be better going with something like the F-23 RTA or F/B-22 if that was their goal, and sticking to a light fighter role for the F-35.
They think it is going to do everything but you'd be better off to yank its electronics suite out and put them in a useful airframe. At this point all it has become is a bomb truck reduced to a sedan with built in amazon so the chinese know you're delivering.