Twitter might not censor that immediately.
Faceberg, however, has a text reading algo which will detect that link and the whole domain is black listed for faceberg.
You can mirror the link and that worked for some anons. You can also try and distort or remove it somehow. The text of the article will still post, just anything that mentions gnews.org will get nixed by the algo.
That isn't completely impossible, but also rather unlikely.
Further, the best intelligence comes from humint. Self-extracting malware is espionage grade stuff which is more like what you would use to exfiltrate information from a secure location (such as lifting the source code from dominion directly).
Dominion likely has little security on their machines by way of covering their tracks for voter fraud. They deal mostly in political brokering and the like - I would wager their programmers are subpar if not straw men hired to hide the fact China actually coded the suite.
Do I need to red text?
You need to remove or substantially alter the gnews.org site text.
Facebook can read text. It doesn't matter what you put around or merge with the image because it is not the image that is tripping the sensor.
. . . . . . . . . .
I will do it once I get home to my computer.
But, no, not with an overlay. You need to break up the text such that the algo can't detect the letters. Or remove the text.
Holy shit…
Anons… Do you not understand the point of a captcha?
It is just reading text like a pdf scanner does. Make it so it can't recognize the letters. Use a blur filter. Make it wavy as fuck. Classic censor bar. Make flowers grow out of it. Whatever you can think of to break up the outline of the letters. Get creative.
It's not AI. It's a simple pattern matching algo.
Hang on… Got to get gimp up on my computer.
Just the address gnews.org. that is the only text triggering the filter. Any place gnews.org exists, you need to censor or distort it - and quite substantially.