>this goes all the way to the Supreme Court
It might need to go that far before MI gets current proof of corruption in the SC. Roberts certainly looks compromised, but do the good guys have proof yet?
>this goes all the way to the Supreme Court
It might need to go that far before MI gets current proof of corruption in the SC. Roberts certainly looks compromised, but do the good guys have proof yet?
Agreed. Don't need him. This anon wants him caught. Arrested. Exposed.
'Bodies' posts from Q. POTUS, Rudy, Prince, and Flynn referenced.
Does POTUS know where the bodies are buried?
Does POTUS have the goods on most bad actors?
Was TRUMP asked to run for President?
Flynn.
What is Flynn’s background?
What was his rank?
Was he involved in intel ops?
What access or special priv?
Why is this relevant?
Set up.
Who wins?
Who becomes exposed?
Who knows where the bodies are buried?
Who has access?
What is MI?
Who was part of MI during BO term?
Who was fired during BO term (MI)?
Why is this relevant?
Who knows where the bodies are buried?
The map is in front of you.
Re-read.
Expand your thinking.
Purpose for time being spent here.
Q
BIDEN / CHINA.
BIG DEVELOPMENT.
TRAITORS EVERYWHERE.
AMERICA FOR SALE.
FLYNN.
Targeted.
Why?
Who knows where the bodies are buried?
CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES.
TRUMP ADMIN v2?
Election theft.
Last hope.
Why would Flynn plead guilty to something untrue?
Define testimony.
Define ‘on record’.
Who knows where the bodies are buried?
Flynn is safe.
Expand your thinking.
Q
Who knows where the bodies are buried?
Re_read drops re: Who knows where….
Rudy.
Now comes the pain.
Q
Any employer can establish policies. You either follow them or don't. If you choose not to follow an employer's policies then the employer can take disciplinary measures per the policy.
It's not a constitutional matter at all.
For example, the US Constitution established my right to bear arms. That doesn't make it my right to counter company policies and carry at work. Businesses post 'No firearms' policies on their doors and ask us not to enter their premises. They are not violating the Constitution by doing (they are just driving away business.)
An employer enters into a contract with an employee. Part of that contract is you follow the employer's policies. It's up to the Anon's spouse to either comply with the mask policy or fight the policy or leave the employ of the employer.