'Food for thought' = "Consider this…" (aka "spitball")

Sworn "first person" affidavits = direct evidence (not circumstancial)

Physical evidence = circumstantial? - until proven?

Sydney not representing campaign = No fudiciary responsibility/ties to 'campaign' (optics perhaps?)

HOW DO YOU INTRODUCE EVIDENCE? see Q 3850, 3742, 2786, 1287, and perhaps more (word search)

Local/State witnesses making sworn affidavits on election fraud, and other = direct evidence

Was election classified? = NO!

Entertain this…

Servers in Germany were siezed, we know… was OP classified? Do not know…

Is the information on the servers classified? I do not know…

Can the information on the servers be hidden? At least from normies/anons? I am sure they are good at it….

Can [MI] or [MIL] make a sworn affidavit to a civ lawyer? (not sure)

Can [civ] worker make a sworn affidavit to a civ lawyer? YES! (see first pargraph)

Can [civ] worker make a sworn affidavit to a civ lawyer if info classified? (I do not think so, at least physical evidence cannot be introduced w/o special handling)

Could the server be 'D-class'? or not classified at all, but hidden? it is possible? It would be legal…

Food for thought…

I may have woke up with larp panties on, but the dumbest question in the world is THE ONE NEVER asked….

Am I wrong?