>>11755933 (lb)
>Not anymore than controlled Russia since 1917.
Well, Russia took over the legal succession of the Soviet Union without necessity.
There is certainly a very important reason for this.
It has never been properly discussed here.
Why is Russia doing this?
That can only have reasons in terms of international law…
No clue.
But the Soviet Union declared war on the then German Reich in WW 2.
If this time is to be dealt with under international law, then there must be a legal successor to the Soviet Union.
Otherwise this is not possible
Just a thought
You think Putin is the placeholder for the Romanovs?
Could be.
The Romanovs are related to many noble houses.
However, I don't think we will see an uplift of the nobility.
If you look at the European history, then with the emergence of the nobility and their hereditary courts and the Catholic Church, the whole crap has only begun.
Come on - since when do we believe the MSM regarding russia?
I have not found any serious sources for this rumor.
Yes, that seems obvious to me in view of what is happening with Hillary and her doppelgangers.
The procedure would be the same.
However, then the question arises who could have replaced Putin and who is the one who can replace Putin but also Hillary?
That would only be a superior force of which we know nothing yet