o7
Fuck yeah. Let's take this home Nightshift.
Other than it's from Hal Turner, it's just great.
SIDE NOTE ADDED: 11/23/2020
The Marshall Report says:
A registered civilian military lawyer IS NOT A JAG which is a Judge Advocate General. Sidney Powell has been a Federal Prosecutor as well as has her own law firm. In Military courts: Other Federal Courts. Anyone going before a military tribunal can have an attorney appointed through JAG or have one from the civilian sector. We are looking at both non-military justice cases regarding treason against the American people and military treason involvement.
Non-military justice cases relating to national security issues (such as treaty interpretation, constitutional law, federal criminal law, and civil liberties) are heard by the general federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals, and U.S. District Courts. For more information on these courts and where you can find their decisions, see the Library’s Case Law Research Guide.https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/c.php?g=365986&p=5204253
Laws are complicated but rest assured Sidney Powell knows the law and is both a criminal prosecutor, and defense lawyer. She is now representing the United States Citizens against blatant constitutional, federal criminal, and civil liberty violations WHICH are treasonous and will not relent in representing the citizens at any court level. She is equipted. Moreover, here is a link that shows the laws and offenses those who took part in the election fraud and foreign nation meddling are facing: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=%2Fprelim%40title18%2Fpart1%2Fchapter115&edition=prelim Aside from her extremely huge Federal Attorney record with the Department of Justice with over 500 Supreme Court Cases, Sidney Powell has proven she is more than equipped to represent military justice/Federal cases such as General Flynn in his Military Logan Act case and had it overturned. Deep State is still fighting that ruling. If there is a discrepency, it would be in the part of the statement that “she is the only one who can prosecute at” should be stated “She is the best one to prosecute at”.