ACTUAL JQ Research
#1 of 2, sauce in #2
Knowledge is power
The so-called Jewish Question have been answered long ago. Scientifically. People with "jewish" genetics are overrepresented in higher positions worldwide, to look at that fact with a fixed assumption of "conspiracy" might lead to the conclusion that people with those genetics are conspiring to rule the world. Remove that assumption and one become open to see the actuality of the situation.
It is like saying that, because people with african DNA is overrepresented in winning marathons, they are manipulating and conspiring to do so. That would be a very limited conclusion, as is the "jews conspire to run the world" -conclusion. The muhjoo-shills have successfully diverted big parts of the movement that search for truth into the assumption that "it's the jews", but ask yourself: Bill&Hill, Comey, Clapper, Brennan, NoName, Page, Strzok, Gates, Soros, MadMaxine, Maher, Fallon, Acosta, Cooper, Epstein, Maxwell, Abramovic, RayChandler, Barry&Mike, GHWB, Kerry, Kissingers, Rothschilds, Payseurs, Pope…on and on. How many of they are joos? Very few, and if one of them are, the shills are there to point that out directly as a "there, you see, it's the joos". Luckily, more and more of us see through this.
Why are this ethnic group overrepresented then?
It is not only about IQ, it is about personality trait genetics, and higher tendency for personal discipline being a significant trait generally high in jewish genetics. It does not matter how high IQ a person have if personal discipline is not there to accomodate the practical implementation of that IQ in the life of the individual. But Ashkenazi jews have a statistically higher medium IQ that all other ethnicities.
For someone who actually want to understand the situation, there are many studies and following articles about the subject. See the list of sauce links in the end of this post.
Here is an excerpt:
In the IQ bell-curve for the general population, 70% of people have an IQ that falls between 86 and 115, with 100 being the exact median. IQ tests such as the Wechsler are re-normed every few years to preserve this median and the standard deviation ranges. (Interestingly, there is some evidence—the so-called “Flynn effect”—that non-normed raw performance on IQ tests has generally been improving over the decades, suggesting that people around the world have been generally getting “smarter” over the past two or three generations (perhaps attributable to better nutrition or greater parental sensitivity to and investment in children’s early developing minds, among other possible factors). In any case, the above figures are the normed range for “average” IQ in the general populace. Because it is an evenly distributed, symmetrical bell-curve, that 70% can be further bisected into 35% of people having IQs of 86-100 and 35% having IQs of 101-115. Outside of those 70% of people in the 86-115 range, 25% of people have IQs in the sub-85 range and in the 116-plus range; this 25% also can be symmetrically sub-divided into 12.5% on each side, so that 12.5% of people have sub-85 IQs and 12.5% of people have 116-plus IQs. This continues along 15-point standard deviations as you move farther from the median.
continued in #2