>>11767019

I am now positive that FB, Twitter, and Google are all working together/coordinating to target and blacklist or even make a list of those who support Trump or are pro America. Absolutely 100% positive and, in fact, I can prove it after events that took place over the past few days. Unfortunately no decision maker will do a single thing about it so it would be a complete waste of time to even go in depth about it. But I can absolutely, 100% with actual hard evidence prove that at least Google/Youtube and Facebook are coordinating to identify, blacklist, censor (and perhaps worse, unknown at this point) those who are pro America. Whether Twitter is involved, no idea as I never had an account but I assume they are though I cannot prove it in their case like I can the other two.

Long story short, how many times have we, the POTUS, or anyone overwhelmingly shown what social media decision makers are doing but nothing ever happens, ever, never, never happens. It should have happened four years ago but it didn't and now we're fucked. Every real anon knows exactly what needs to be done to clean up this country but unfortunately no decision maker will do it. The Communists on the other hand WILL do it and will waste absolutely no time hunting down and disappearing each and every pro America citizen out there. And nobody will question it since they own the media, social media, and everything else. We had four years to handle this… four fucking years… and we are depending on a SCOTUS decision and some paperwork to determine it. How fucking retarded I feel right now….

>>11767138

I have no authority to do those kinds of things as I am not a criminal. If I had the authority to do it I would have done it immediately after 2016 as it needed to be handled. However, those who have the authority to do such things (military, feds, POTUS, etc) are simply unwilling to handle business in the face of overwhelming and PUBLIC statements of desire to destroy our nation. It is their duty to handle it, they are simply not doing it/have not done it which is hugely disheartening. If I was granted the authority it would be done in a week but that would never happen obviously.

>>11767197

Authority comes from the Commander in Chief, the President of the United States who is the decision maker of the entire military apparatus and any/all decisions he makes are unquestionable and must be carried out bar issues that are considered crimes against the Geneva Convention. He has full authority otherwise. He has the authority to grant the Fifth Freedom as well in times of need. He has the authority to deploy Delta or other similar black ops divisions to defend and protect the nation and the Constitution of the United States of America against ALL enemies both foreign and domestic. In this case we have domestic enemies who are literally decrying their desire to fundamentally destroy the Untied States and he has the authority to supersede the two Houses and deploy assets to safeguard the nation. In this he has failed spectacularly from what I have personally seen and the time limit remaining.

I love the man, have fully supported him through and through, have sacrificed an immense amount during this time period because I believe the nations health supersedes any happiness I may want. Perhaps I will be proven wrong over the next month but given what I have seen thus far I have no hope in that happening if the ultimate card to be played is depending on the court system which, all it would take, is for them to blackmail or even kill off one single member to fubar that plan. And we all know they will do whatever it takes. He should have handled the issue immediately, in that he has failed and put at risk millions upon millions of good people who supported him. He needs to move and handle business or this country will be dead and gone within three months.

>>11767205

Completely unrelated. The Founders broke away to form their own country and in this case the country is established. Terrible comparison.

>>11767305

It does come from the Commander in Chief and him making that decision is within the laws of the land. Do you not know what duties the POTUS has granted unto them and what they can/cannot do in the face of publicly stated insurrection? If not you would be wise to look into that because he is well within his right to consider them enemy combatants and take action therein. They have publicly stated they want to destroy and alter the United States so he is absolutely well within his right to consider them enemy combatants.

>>11767385

I am not going to get into a philosophical discussion about what you are asking as that is akin to Clinton claiming there are more than one definition of the word "and" to try to weasel out of something. Bottom line is simple: He has the authority to take severe and consistent action against anyone/everyone who is involved in, publicly stated, or is openly acting in a manner to destroy the United States of America. That is his primary duty in actuality. When people commit fraud to destroy your nation - they are enemy combatants. When foreign individuals attempt to poison the minds of the citizens of the country to gain any/all types of advantages, they are enemy combatants. When citizens destroy property while screaming "no USA at all", they are enemy combatants. When social media employees censor legitimate and fundamentally protected First Amendment material in an attempt to aid the destruction of our nation, they are enemy combatants. When media members publicly state they want to make a list to "reeducate" pro American citizens, they are enemy combatants. When media employees purposely help perpetrate a fraud on the greater public with an aim to disarm, harm, or create havoc in the United States, they are enemy combatants.

There is no black and white, there is no middle ground, they simply are enemy combatants and if I had it my way they would be dealt with immediately as I am positive they will be killing off every single pro America voice the very moment the POTUS leaves office followed by his own family members being attacked which they will undoubtedly plan attacks for. He should have long handled these issues, LONG ago handled them. This isn't a popularity contest, who gives a single fuck what Germany thinks, or Britain thinks, or anyone thinks, his job is to safeguard the people of the United States against threats and all those things I mentioned are massive threats that have festered for decades now and he had the perfect chance to handle them. Will it be handled? Who knows but at this point I highly doubt it.

>>11767526

No.

>>11767564

Yeah, yeah…. more words and claims of "tick tock". It's always coming soon and always about to happen. FUCK YOU and DO SOMETHING!

>>11767592

It's just amazing to me. After four years of these media suckers doing everything they could to destroy our nation they are now so brazen to think they are responsible for electing a President. I hate those SOBs…