>>11764950 (PB)

The people affected most by this do not have family to eat with. They are outcasts, they are travelers. BTDT

>>11765249 (PB)

Basically, you can't. But you can establish that there were enough invalid ballots cast and accepted to justify invalidating the election itself.

>>11765265 (PB)

Nah ... all the Mayan calendar said was that their current age ended in 2012. They never so much as hinted that there would be no age to follow it.

>>11764932

It would not hurt to dig into the legality of the emergency session convened immediately BEFORE the onset of the Covid scare. A unanimous vote of such a far-reaching / impromptu measure does not pass the sniff test.

>>11764945 (PB)

Why would you pray to anyone except the One Jesus prayed to?

>>11765064 (PB)

Sure. The moment you prove your case. But not one second before. And my admission of that will exactly mirror the Democrat admission of Trump's victory in 2016. Tooth and claw, you sonofabitch -- tooth and claw.

>>11765126 (PB)

If you are an Anon, you'll shrug stuff off. If you can't do that, you might as well leave now. Frankly, I think you are just in here to jerk chains.

>>11765191 (PB)

Does not apply if Biden is in position to nullify it.

>>11765358 (PB)

Contemporary ethics calls for splitting the switch, with one end going one way and the other going the other way. Will derail the street car with little risk to ANY life. Then, go find the guy who set the whole scenario up and kick his ever-loving ass!