dChan
Anonymous ID: 268d53 April 24, 2018, 10:10 p.m. No.1177739   🗄️.is đź”—kun

1,049,200 'Serious Offenses' Reported in Nation's Public Schools in 2015-16

By Susan Jones | April 24, 2018 | 12:08 PM EDT

 

(CNSNews.com) - In the 2015-2016 school year, 1,049,200 "serious offenses" were reported in the nation's 96,360 public schools in 17,337 school districts, covering 50.6 million students, the U.S. Education Department's Office for Civil Rights reported on Tuesday.

 

Ninety-four percent of those serious offenses (990,600) involved physical attacks or threats of physical attack without a weapon. Two percent (22,000) involved physical attacks or threats of physical attack with some type of weapon.

 

Other "serious offenses" included in the 1,049,200 total were robbery, sexual assault, rape, and weapons possession (see list below).

 

For the first time in 2015-1016, the Education Department's Civil Rights Data Collection required schools to report school-related shootings and school-related homicides.

 

The survey says nearly 240 schools (0.2 percent of all schools) reported at least one incident involving a school-related shooting; and around 100 schools (0.1 percent of all schools) reported a school-related homicide involving a student, faculty member, or staff member.

 

About 1 of every 100,000 students was enrolled in a school that reported a school-related shooting or school-related homicide during the 2015–16 school year.

 

(The total number of school-related shootings or the total number of school-related homicides are not reported. The data reflect the number of schools that

had at least one incident of a school-related shooting or school-related homicide.)

 

Here's the number and type of serious offenses reported in 2015-2016:

 

Physical attack or fight without a weapon: 789,800

Threats of physical attack without a weapon: 200,800

Robbery without a weapon: 22,900

Physical attack or fight with a weapon: 11,900

Threats of physical attack with a weapon; 10,100

Sexual assault (other than rape): 10,100

Possession of a firearm or explosive device: 5,700

Threats of physical attack with a firearm or explosive device: 3,500

Physical attack or fight with a firearm or explosive device: 2,200

Rape or attempted rape: 1,100

Robbery with a weapon: 640

Robbery with a firearm or explosive device: 560

 

Other findings from the 2015-2016 Civil Rights Data Collection:

 

– During the 2015–16 school year, 291,100 students were referred to law enforcement agencies or arrested.

 

– Approximately 82,800 of the 291,100 total students referred to law enforcement or arrested were students with disabilities.

 

– Black students represented 15 percent of the total student enrollment, and 31 percent of students who were referred to law enforcement or arrested – a 16 percentage point disparity. White students represented 49 percent of the total student enrollment, and accounted for 36 percent of those referred to law enforcement or arrested.

 

– Males represented 51 percent of all enrolled students, and 69 percent of those who received a referral to law enforcement or were arrested during the 2015-16 school year.

 

– Overall, approximately 135,600 individual allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex, race, sexual orientation, disability, or religion were reported during the 2015-16 school year.

 

– About 2.7 million (5 to 6 percent) of all K-12 students received one or more out-of-school suspensions during the 2015-16 school year.

 

– Approximately 120,700 students (about 0.2 percent of the total number of students enrolled) were expelled, with or without educational services.

 

The report, found here, breaks down most of the categories mentioned above by race.

Anonymous ID: 268d53 April 24, 2018, 10:40 p.m. No.1177956   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7968 >>7975 >>7978

This Common Law Grand Jury indictment illustrates how WE THE PEOPLE will find a way to serve justice on these TRAITORS if the Federal government refuses to do so.

UNSEALED: HRC, Uranium 1, Comey, BUNDY Ranch, Murder #CASE1:16-cv-01490-LEK-DJS

 

24 pages of Indictment: https:// download.wunderlist.io/21ccbef0-270d-0136-fd0e-22000a7e2e1a-1524258609-750056?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJEN6W4AO3LJODOAA&Expires=1526850610&Signature=1QMHYk3i%2F4Q742Sf%2FVYCXclOhV0%3D

 

Are “Common Law” Grand Juries Valid?

December 30, 2014 T.J. McCann

INTRO: With various applications of common law grand juries currently being popular, such as the case in Dixie County Florida, where Terry Trussell, formerly of Operation American Spring, is facing 14 felony charges for “Impersonating a Pubic Officer” and “Unlawful Use of Simulated Legal Process”, among other charges, now facing the possibility of the remainder of his life behind bars, or the Nevada common law grand jury claiming to have proved the “missing” 13th Titles of Nobility amendment was actually ratified by Virginia and thereby an actual amendment to the Constitution, or National Liberty Alliance’s own “Quo Warranto” (pdf) petition to various federal judges, these issues are obviously increasing in number, and should be considered.

1) ARE “COMMON LAW” GRAND JURIES VALID?

2) “COMMON LAW” VERSUS “NATURAL LAW”

3) IMPLICATIONS OF “COMMON LAW” GRAND JURIES BEING VALID

4) CAN GRAND JURIES INDICT “AT WILL”?

5) CONCLUSIONS: What is evident.

ARE SO-CALLED “COMMON LAW” GRAND JURIES VALID?

Some have claimed that Common Law Grand Juries are supported by the Constitution itself, and even cite Supreme Court decisions, particularly United States v Williams (1992), as supporting these ad hoc common law grand juries. However these claims do not appear to have any actual truth to them.

The only place the U.S. Constitution specifically references “common law” is the 7th Amendment, where it is actually referenced to prohibit the common law practice of Courts creating law from the bench in cases where there is no written law, and does this by affirming the right to a trial by jury, thereby prohibiting government dictate of what the law is, and minimizing a source of tyrannous dictate. As a result, the 7th Amendment is actually undermining that common law, rather than affirming common law practice as any sort of guiding philosophy of this country. This is discussed further in the comments section.

In 1992, Antonin Scalia made citations to the Grand Jury in United States v Williams, and referenced a few Supreme Court cases in doing so:

Hannah v. Larche (1960): “Rooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history.”

United States v. Chanen (1977, citing Nixon v. Sirica, 1973): “the grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right.”

Scalia also stated: “the grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside…”

Scalia there also indicated:

“In fact, the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people. See Stirone v. United States, 361 U.S. 212, 218 (1960); Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 61 (1906); G. Edwards, The Grand Jury 28-32 (1906). Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the Judicial Branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm’s length. Judges’ direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. See United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 343 (1974); Fed.Rule Crim.Proc. 6(a). [504 U.S. 36, 48] “

MORE: https:// libertyborn.wordpress.com/2014/12/30/are-common-law-grand-juries-valid/

 

Source: https:// www.sgtreport.com/2018/04/common-law-grand-jury-we-the-people-vs-hillary-clinton-indictment-unsealed/