>>11776552 (lb)
If there's any chance dems will accept the voter fraud, Biden/Harris are the perfect scapegoats. Most likely to warrant the, "Dumb fucks tried a stupid steal", reaction. Easy to believe they're dirty enough and stupid enough to try it. Who was it who said, "Don't underestimate Joes's ability to fuck things up?" Obama.
Whether you like Hillary or not, she has a cult following and the cognitive dissonance factor with her would have caused more problems than with Biden.
My take.
>• Late ballots marked on time
>• 10,000+ GOP votes not counted in WI alone & 10,000+ requested ballots filled out by someone else
>• Illegally cured signatures
>• Non-citizens voting
>• 1000’s of out of state + dead voters in disputed states
I agree with Byrne on this issue, namely, these arguments are a red squirrel. Too easily dismissed, too hard to resolve, and it can be argued that there weren't enough votes involved to make a difference.
Real issue is the smartmatic vulnerability (Qsnatch) and the ability for an admin to move masses of "to be adjudicated" votes into Biden's column. That's the only explanation for masses of pure Biden votes that would have been impossible to scan in the time period involved.
Sidney's going with Byrne and his team, who have been in action since the summer, proactively reverse-engineering the election steal.
>Neither Biden nor Harris are smart enough to organize the election fraud.
Agree. I'm saying normies wouldn't put it past them to try it. Perfect villains if you need some for TV. Much easier to sell the steal to the public with those two in the spotlight.