Interdasting?

In the background of the Durham picture is JD Hayworth from Arizona???

sure looks a lot like him.

ask him about if this Durham is a real dude or not

and how he feels about McCain

PB

>>11778316

>>11778291

>>11778270

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._D._Hayworth

John David Hayworth Jr. (born July 12, 1958) is an American television host and former politician. He served as a Republican member of the United States House of Representatives from 1995 to 2007 from Arizona's 5th Congressional District. He currently hosts Newsmax Prime, a television news/talk prime time show that airs weekdays at 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time and 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time on Newsmax TV. Previously, he hosted a conservative talk radio program on KFYI in Phoenix until January 2010, when he resigned due to his run for the U.S. Senate.

A graduate of North Carolina State University, Hayworth anchored sports reports for three television stations during the 1980s and early 1990s. In 1994, Hayworth was elected to represent Arizona's 6th congressional district, which was redistricted into the 5th District starting in the 2002 House elections. He was defeated in 2006 by Democratic candidate Harry Mitchell.

In 2010, he unsuccessfully ran for the U.S. Senate,

losing to incumbent Senator John McCain in the Republican primary.[1][2]

Known for his outspoken nature—he called President Clinton an "unprincipled philandering president" who had "the most corrupt administration in U.S. history"

Hayworth had considered running for the Governor of Arizona in the 2006 elections against incumbent Democrat Janet Napolitano, but in March 2005 he announced that he preferred to stay in Congress. In the spring of 2005, Napolitano was enjoying a 79 percent favorable job rating.[12]

In the 2006 election, Hayworth faced former Tempe mayor, state senator, and then-state Democratic Party chairman Harry Mitchell. A number of prominent Republicans endorsed Mitchell,[13] and this defection appeared to have influenced the general election. CD-5, despite having a 60% Republican active registered voter advantage over Democrats (139,057 vs 86,743 in October 2006),[14] nevertheless saw Hayworth narrowly defeated by Mitchell.

While most media outlets called the race for Mitchell on election night, Hayworth refused to concede due to a large number of absentee and early-voting ballots.

However, when it became apparent that Mitchell's lead was too large to overcome, Hayworth conceded on November 14. He ultimately lost by 8,000 votes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._D._Hayworth

>>11778406

https://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/mccain_mocks_hayworth/

MAY 25, 2010

McCain: J.D. Hayworth is dumb

A new Web ad for the Arizona senator pounces on a gaffe by his GOP primary foe to portray him as ridiculous

ohn McCain's campaign can't seem to decide whether they think J.D. Hayworth's Republican primary bid is a real threat to the incumbent's political career, or a nuisance launched by a guy who even Arizona's GOP voters realize doesn't belong in the Senate.

A new Web ad McCain launched Tuesday lands pretty firmly on the latter side. Watch here:

McCain advisors say their polling finds many Arizona voters don't consider Hayworth an entirely serious candidate; obviously, a Web ad that tags him as dumb seems to play directly into that. When Hayworth served in the House, he often came off as a blowhard, portentously calling for over-the-top legislation on immigration and border control without actually getting any of it done. That helped Democrat Harry Mitchell beat him in 2006 in a marginal district (that, and Hayworth's ties to Jack Abramoff). The Arizona Republic called Hayworth a bully in endorsing Mitchell.

Which would all seem to argue for a strategy of ridiculing Hayworth in the primary. The tactic has worked, sort of, for McCain before; the Web ads advisor Fred Davis made in the summer of 2008 mocking Barack Obama helped narrow the presidential race in August and early September. And Obama is a much harder target for lampooning than Hayworth.

Instead of focusing on reminding voters how much they disliked Hayworth in the past, and how absurd he can be, though, McCain has simultaneously done that and run to the right to protect himself as if Hayworth was a perfectly credible candidate. In the process, he's exposed himself to some ridicule, for the way he's reversed himself on immigration and the military's ban on gay soldiers. The campaign has shifted into areas that could be more favorable to Hayworth like border security in part because McCain has jumped over to Hayworth's side of just about every debate.

The political climate this year is obviously pretty dire for incumbents, including in primaries; just ask Bob Bennett or Arlen Specter. But Hayworth isn't even getting the Tea Party support some Republican challengers have. Clearly, Hayworth isn't breaking through to voters the way other GOP insurgents did – McCain is still up by 20 points in the polls, despite his long Washington résumé in a year when that won't help you. Maybe soon he'll realize that.

MIKE MADDEN

Mike Madden is Salon's Washington correspondent.

>>11778418

>>11778406

https://www.jonchristianryter.com/Two_Cents/2cworth.100814.html

The John McCain Primer:

Rigging an Election 1, 2, 3

In politics there are donkeys, elephants and snakes. Sometimes, particularly when it comes to institutionalized politicians like Sen. John McCain, its hard to tell one from another. Why? Because McCain is all of them rolled into one. That makes him more dangerous than most political snakes whose ideological moorings are more easily identified. McCain is one of the "political purple people"—ideologically Republican (Red) and Democratic (Blue) at the same time. He is both a conservative and liberal at the same time. McCain is a chameleon whose political pedigree changes with the wind.

In 2008 McCain was picked by the barons of banking as the designated loser of the Presidential Election of 2008. McCain, like Sen. Barack Obama, was financially supported by Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase—and George Soros. Dollars that went to McCain but not Obama came from Blank Rome, LLP and Greenburg Traurig LLP. Before the results of the New Hampshire primary came in, the nominees of both major political parties had already been picked. Not by the voters. By the money barons. As the Jan. 8, 2008 New Hampshire Democratic primary results began to trickle in the exit polls indicated Hillary was going to win. She was upbeat as the numbers began to pop up on the tote board. It was going to be a good night. At least until one of Hillary's campaign managers whispered in her ear. The color drained from her face. She sat down in a folding chair and, even with a straight face that revealed nothing, tears welled in her eyes. Hillary won the primary 39% to 36% but she lost 100% of her financial support from Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase before the first ballot was counted. The money barons decided to pick another horse in the Democratic race. They had suddenly become convinced that enough Americans hated Hillary that she could not be elected. So, they jumped shipped and joined forces with George Soros, throwing their support behind Obama. From New Hampshire on, whenever Obama spoke about the aftermath of the election, he always prefaced his statements, "When I am President…" He knew he was going to win. So did McCain.

That's why McCain picked Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate. He needed someone to blame his loss on so he would remain viable to run for, and win reelection to, his US Senate seat in 2010. Palin, however, boosted McCain's ratings. The liberal media spent most of the presidential campaign attacking Palin in order to diminish her in the eyes of the voters. The more they attacked the higher her popularity soared. When the campaign ended and the votes were counted, the McCain-Palin ticket won 59,934,814 votes. The votes bearing Obama's name totaled 69,456,897. But, there is a problem with them. Obama is a Marxist. There are 31,600,000 socialists or far left liberals in the United States who would have cast their votes for him. That's all. It appears that about 3 million independents voted for him as well. That means Obama should have won about 34.6 million votes. But there was a problem with the ballots in the ballot boxes around the country.

According to the Federal Election Commission website immediately after the election (now altered), there were 169 million registered voters in the United States. Fifty-six point eight percent of those registered voters voted. That's 96,992,000 actual voters who voted. (In the revised version of that website at the end of Nov., 2009, the 56.8% now represents the number of Democrats who voted, and not the actual number of voters who voted.) The problem is, on Nov. 4, 2008, there were 132,618,580 ballots in the ballot boxes. That was the result of ACORN's get-out-and-vote effort even though the left will claim the extra votes were the result of vote fraud by Republicans.

continued:

>>11778425

>>11778418

>>11778406

continued: https://www.jonchristianryter.com/Two_Cents/2cworth.100814.html

When you do the simple math, that means there were 35,626,580 too many votes in the ballot boxes. The "too many votes" were the results of the "Motor Voter Law" that was crafted as the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 by the Democratically-controlled Congress during the Clinton years specifically to make vote fraud easy for the far left that lacked the followers to win national elections without cheating. Yet without looking at the voter statistics which indicated there were 35,626,500 more votes than voters, McCain and the Republican Party blamed Sarah Palin and launched a national smear campaign to malign her. Palin, who came to Arizona this summer to campaign for Senator McCain seemed clueless that her loss of popularity in the country (down to 38% from 57% during the 2008 presidential campaign) was instigated by her 2008 running mate. And, yet, there she was, campaigning for him like he was an honest broker. Palin made the biggest political blunder of her life. As popular as she still is with conservatives, she nevertheless expended a lot of political capital she shouldn't have wasted by going to Arizona and campaigning for McCain against former Rep. JD Hayworth. Once again, she was duped by McCain who is not an honest broker. He never was.

The Maverick, you will recall, climbed into bed with four Democratic senators to improperly intervene with banking regulators on behalf of Lincoln Savings & Loan Association CEO Charles Keating. McCain and Senators Alan Cranston [D-CA], Dennis Deconcini [D-AZ], John Glenn [D-OH] and Donald Riegle [D-MI] took a total of $1.3 million in political contributions from Keating to stop an investigation of Lincoln Savings & Loan by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board [FHLBB]. which believed Keating had exposed the FDIC to huge losses. Ultimately, the Lincoln Savings & Loan collapse cost taxpayers $160.1 billion. Three of the Senators: Cranston, DeConcini and Riegle were reprimanded. Glenn, a national hero, and McCain were not. Their interference in the FHLBB kept the Lincoln Savings & Loan Association and Keating's American Continental Corporation in business for four years, doubling the financial liability of the US taxpayers. At the very least, all of the Keating Five should have been expelled from the Senate. Charges were filed against the Keating Five on Oct. 13, 1989. McCain, who had as much political capital with the Democratic leadership as he did with the Republicans, avoided any penalty for his role in stymieing the investigation of Keating and Lincoln Savings & Loan. Unlike wine, politicians do not get better with age. They just get more corrupt.

That's why, in 2010, the voters of Arizona and elsewhere who have been adding 2 + 2 together are finally getting four. In Arizona, they decided early on that this was going to be the year for change. McCain disagreed. He likes his job, and the money barons who profit from his being in the US Senate want him to keep it. When former Congressman JD Hayworth decided to throw his hat in the ring for McCain's Senate seat, the April Public Policy Poll showed him trailing the 4-term Senator by 11 points, 46% to 35%. The Rocky Mountain Poll gave McCain a better lead than that—54% to 28%. Other polls put McCain below 50%. As Hayworth launched his financially-impoverished campaign he focused on McCain as an establishment candidate, which he is. As Hayworth used the Tea Party to drum up support, McCain countered by asking newly elected Sen. Scott Brown [R-MA] and his former running mate, Sarah Palin to come to Arizona and campaign for him. Both did. Both erred. But McCain profited from their campaigning. When McCain mobilized their support, Palin, who is loved by a majority of Tea Party advocates effectively countered Hayworth by saying "We might as well call it like it is. And not beat around the bush. In respect to the Tea Party movement… you know what…everyone here today [is] supporting John McCain. We are all part of the Tea Party movement. When you talk about that Tea Party movement, some would claim John was there at that first Tea Party movement…But, I've gotta remind people, before there were protests in the street or marches on Capitol Hill, there was the maverick fighting for us."

continued:

>>11778432

>>11778425

>>11778418

>>11778406

continued: https://www.jonchristianryter.com/Two_Cents/2cworth.100814.html

Even with Scott Brown and Sarah Palin—who left Arizona somewhat tarnished from the experience—McCain could not escape his problem. He was an establishment politician who is owned by the princes of industry and the barons of banking and business and not the voters who cast the ballots that place the candidates back in office. And, what's more, increasingly, more voters are getting to know it. Normally candidates who compete with the political superstars are nobody wanabees who couldn't win the nomination if they were the only people running. Institutionalized politicians like McCain seldom have to worry about fighting real candidates for re-nomination. In fact, most institutionalized politicians who work-across-the-aisle with the opposition Party's leaders are immune from Party-supported opposition candidates in the general election as well.

When McCain retired from the US Navy as a Captain in 1981, he went to work for his father-in-law, Jim Hensley, head of Hensley & Co., the largest Anheuser-Busch beer distributorships in the southwest. McCain decided to run for the 1st Congressional seat when 15-term Congressman John J. Rhodes retired in 1982. His opponent in that race was State Senator Jim Mack. It was a tough race that required a lot of Hensley money for McCain to eke out a narrow win.

Until today, the only other campaign spending binge McCain embarked on was his first Senate race when he had to engage in a financial slugfest with State legislator Richard Kimball to win the Senate seat held by retiring Barry Goldwater in 1986. In July, McCain spent $3.5 million to hammer Hayworth. The McCain Campaign reported that it took in $3.2 million in donations in July. In reality, $2.9 million was transferred to McCain's Senatorial campaign from his 2008 presidential campaign. Real donors only contributed $300 thousand. McCain, who started his reelection campaign with over $15 million in the bank from his senatorial election campaign fund and what was left of his 2008 campaign fund, has not been bashful about spending if he had the right negative ads to damage his opponent. Hayworth spent $1.09 million in July, collecting an additional $416 thousand as he attempted to launch a successful counteroffensive that painted McCain as an establishment candidate who votes for special interest groups and not the voters. But, with McCain outspending him 5-to-1, Hayworth was out of his league as McCain smothered his voice throughout the State.

Adding to Hayworth's problems were blogger like Jesse Matthewson, a Libertarian, who insists that both Hayworth and McCain are wrong for Arizona. Matthewson is one of several misguided bloggers who are supporting McCain's third party spoiler, Jim Deakin, since a vote for Deakin is actually a vote for McCain. And, yes, both McCain and Deakin understand that. That was, after all, why Deakin was in the race.

Let's look at what we know about Deakin. Let's skip to the chase and forget the reams of words about the improper use of lobbyists like Jack Abramoff by Tyco International to gain the assistance of Congressman and Senators by greasing the sweaty palms of politicians with campaign contributions to kill legislation that would add a tax surcharge to US manufacturers who send their jobs overseas and go right to a Tyco employee named Jim Deakin, now a political newcomer in Arizona politics. In 2008 when McCain was the designated loser in the Presidential election, a Tyco lawyer named Gardner Courson who, like Deakin, worked in the Tyco Fire Security Division. Courson was McCain's legal adviser. As JD Hayworth began closing the gap between himself and McCain, Deakin—with no political experience or reason to run—popped into the race and began describing this as a race between him and McCain, discounting Hayworth like he was not even in the campaign. Deakin, who talks like a smoothly brewed cup of tea with a Tea Party tag-on-a-string hanging out of the cup, gained the support of anti-incumbent Tea Party advocates even though he's not the real thing.

continued:

>>11778435

>>11778432

>>11778425

>>11778418

>>11778406

continued: https://www.jonchristianryter.com/Two_Cents/2cworth.100814.html

William Gheen, Hayworth's campaign manager, asked Deakin to drop out of the race in order to give Hayworth a chance to beat McCain. Deakin is polling 5% in the latest polls after McCain's spending $3.5 million on negative Hayworth campaign ads in July. A Deakin spokesman suggested that Hayworth drop out, claiming Deakin was the best candidate to beat McCain. Gheen issued a statement saying that "…Deakin claims he is the best candidate to defeat McCain, but nobody can find any example in the history of the United States when a candidate polling as low as Deakin five weeks before the election has ever won a race in America. Deakin's statement," Gheen concluded, "is either delusional or he is [wittingly or unwittingly] a spoiler for John McCain."

Blogger Susan Bradford wrote in Sonoran Alliance that "…the Senator and Deakin talk out of both sides of their mouths and are waging a faux battle against each other in order to nix the chances of JD Hayworth…who has the resounding support of the Tea Party Movement. As the New Yorker Magazine has already revealed, McCain anticipated Hayworth's candidacy [in] late 2009 and was afraid the former Congressman might beat him…Then along came Deakin."

Deakin, by the way, is a shareholder in Detek, Inc. and Liberty Fire Protection Company. Liberty is a contractor for Simplex Grinnell, LLP, a subsidiary of Tyco Fire & Security, LLP which, in turn, is a division of Tyco International. Tyco owes McCain for his support on two measures. One that exempted Tyco from a tax surcharge levied against companies that took their manufacturing overseas and, second, legislation that limits the liability of oil companies. McCain voted to include Tyco. Oh, by the way, Deakin has also benefited from McCain legislative largess. Liberty Fire Protection was the beneficiary of $28,856.00 in government contracts from the Navy and from the Department of Veterans Affairs. Detek fared even better. They received contracts totaling $637,241.00 from the Department of the Army, Navy, State, the Secret Service and the Defense Logistic Agency. It's sad that the voters don't take the time to check out the candidates they take at face value. If they did, they would not vote for either McCain or Deakin. Both of them appear to be campaigning as reformers who are determined to end "business as usual" in the nation's capital when both of them are "gimme" candidates who are solidly in bed with the princes of industry and the barons of banking and business. You can bet if and when McCain is reelected, www.FedSpending.org will show that Deakin is the recipient of new McCain largess for his role in helping the Senator save his job. Once again, for whatever it's worth, you have my two cents worth.

>>11778425

>>11778432

>>11778435

>>11778439

2009

>In politics there are donkeys, elephants and snakes.

>Sometimes, particularly when it comes to institutionalized politicians like Sen. John McCain, its hard to tell one from another.

.

>>11778425

purple is a thing

ask HRC

and Rachel Chandler Purple Diary

>Why? Because McCain is all of them rolled into one. That makes him more dangerous than most political snakes whose ideological moorings are more easily identified. McCain is one of the "political purple people"—ideologically Republican (Red) and Democratic (Blue) at the same time. He is both a conservative and liberal at the same time. McCain is a chameleon whose political pedigree changes with the wind.

it is wow

>>11778425

READ THIS FROM 2009

>>11778425

hmmm

>The "too many votes" were the results of the "Motor Voter Law" that was crafted as the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 by the Democratically-controlled Congress during the Clinton years specifically to make vote fraud easy for the far left that lacked the followers to win national elections without cheating.

>>11778514

it is when a believer bridges the divide of someone who is not covered by Jesus

in prayer to cover them as they have a gap in their connection to HIM

>>11778514

>>11778527

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=standing+in+the+gap+bible&atb=v225-1&ia=web

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=bridgingthe+the+gap+bible&atb=v225-1&ia=web

>>11778514

>>11778536

Jesus is the ultimate bridge

>>11778514

>>11778538

https://www.navigators.org/resource/the-bridge-to-life/

The Bridge to Life can help you give a simple explanation of the Gospel message to anyone. If your friend wonders, “How can I know God?” – you can visually show our separation from God and how Jesus has bridged the gap for us.

One of the oldest questions humankind has been asking is, “How can I know God?” The question is a valid one. What is He like? What can we do to please Him? How can we get to Heaven? If we work hard enough to be a good enough person will He accept us then? If we do enough religious activities to get His attention, will that do it?

Fortunately for us, the answer is surprisingly simple. The “Gospel” that the Bible talks about literally means, “the Good News,” and the news is good indeed!

First, we have to start at the beginning. In Genesis 1:26, when God created the first humans, He said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness”, then God blessed them and spent the days walking and talking with the people He had created. In short, life was good.

But why isn’t life like that anymore? What happened to mess everything up? This brings us to the second point: when we (humankind) chose to do the opposite of what God told us, sin poisoned the world. Sin separated us from God, and everything changed. Romans 3:23 says, “For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,” and in Isaiah 59:2 we’re told, “your iniquities have separated you from your God; your sins have hidden his face from you so that he will not hear.”

This is especially bad news because there is no way for us to get across that gap on our own. We (humankind) have tried to find our way back to God and a perfect world on our own ever since then, and without any luck. We try to get there by being good people, or through religion, money, morality, philosophy, education, or any number of other ways, but eventually we find out that none of it works. “There is a way that seems right to a man, but in the end it leads to death” (Proverbs 14:12).

The Bridge to Life Illustration | Discipleship Resource | The NavigatorsThere is only one way to find peace with God, and the Bible says it is through Jesus Christ. We were stranded without any way of getting back to our Creator, and we needed a way to pay for our sins and be clean again so that we could be welcomed back to be with Him. Romans 5:8 says, “But God demonstrates His own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” So this is the Good News—that even though we were still enemies of God (as one translation says), Jesus came to die on the cross and pay the price for our sins so that we could have a relationship with Him again. John 3:16 says, “For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life.”

The Bridge to Life Illustration | Discipleship Resources | The NavigatorsWhat then should be our reaction to this awesome news? This brings us to the last and most important part. John 5:24 says, “I tell you the truth, whoever hears my word and believes Him who sent me has eternal life and will not be condemned; he has crossed over from death to life.” Jesus Christ himself even says, “I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full” (John 10:10), and Romans 5:1 says, “we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.”

continued:

>>11778549

continued: https://www.navigators.org/resource/the-bridge-to-life/

So how can I have peace with God, life to the full, and be confident of eternal life like these verses say? First, through an honest prayer to God, I have to admit that I’m not perfect—that I can’t escape my sins, and I can’t save myself. I follow this admission by believing that Jesus Christ died for me on the cross and rose from the grave, conquering death and sin. Then I invite Jesus Christ to live in me and be the Lord of my life, accepting His free gift of eternal life with Him.

The prayer can go something like this:

“Dear Jesus, I know that I am a sinner and that I need You to forgive me. I know that You died a painful death so that my sins could be washed clean. Thank you. I want to make You the Lord of my life, and I will trust and follow You. Everything I have is Yours now. In Your name, Lord. Amen.”

There is nothing magical about these words. It’s not the words themselves that make things right between you and God—it’s whether or not your heart really means it. We know this because in 1 Samuel 16:7, the Bible says, “The Lord does not look at the things people look at. People look at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart.”

The best part of this whole process is that it doesn’t matter how badly we’ve messed up, Jesus is powerful enough to save anyone from their sins—even the worst of us. Romans 10:13 says, “Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.” That’s fantastic news—no matter how badly we’ve messed up, we can place our complete trust in Jesus, and He will wipe all of our sins off the face of the earth. Jesus is the bridge to life.

All scripture quotations, unless otherwise indicated, are taken from the Holy Bible, New International Version®, NIV®. Copyright ©1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.™ Used by permission of Zondervan. All rights reserved worldwide. www.zondervan.com The “NIV” and “New International Version” are trademarks registered in the United States Patent and Trademark Office by Biblica, Inc.™

The Bridge to Life ©1976 The Navigators, all rights reserved.

The Bridge to Life is also available in booklet form. Order from NavPress.

>>11778549

>>11778552

>>11778568

the most

notable

don't let HIM pass by

>>11778574

who do you say is (((he)))

>>11778574

>>11778600

>>11778602

>>11778597

miley and dolly and billy ray and the mom trish

i think she is a offspring of dolly parton lineage

not just a god parent

i think dolly is really dirty but has us all fooled

all of it is inbreeding stuff

cabal and masonic evil shit

>>11778635

>>11778635

evil females

leading others astray

seeds

#femen #MileyCyrus #SHEISCOMING

Miley Cyrus - Mother's Daughter (Official Video)

https://youtu.be/7T2RonyJ_Ts

"Mother's Daughter"

Hallelujah, I'm a freak, I'm a freak

Hallelujah, every day of the week

I'mma do yeah, like I want ah

I'mma Nile crocodile, a piranha

Oh my God, she got the power

Oh look at her, she got the power

Don't fuck with my freedom

I came up to get me some

I'm nasty, I'm evil

Must be something in the water

Or that I'm my mother's daughter

Don't fuck with my freedom

I came up to get me some

I'm nasty, I'm evil

Must be something in the water

Or that I'm my mother's daughter

So back up, back up, back up, back up, boy, ooh

Back up, back up, back up, back up, boy, ooh hey

Hallelujah, I'mma witch, I'mma witch

Hallelujah, swish, swish

I'mma three point shooter

I blow through ya

Like a hot wind out in the bayou, yeah

Oh my God, she got the power

Whoa look at her, she got the power

Don't fuck with my freedom

I came up to get me some

I'm nasty, I'm evil

Must be something in the water

Or that I'm my mother's daughter

Don't fuck with my freedom

I came up to get me some

I'm nasty, I'm evil

Must be something in the water

Or that I'm my mother's daughter

So back up, back up, back up, back up, boy, ooh

Back up, back up, back up, back up, boy, ooh

Back up, back up, back up, back up, boy, ooh

Back up, back up, back up, back up, boy, ooh

My mama always told me that I'd make it

That I'd make it, so I made it

I put my back into it, my heart in it

So I did it, yeah I did it

My mama always told me that I'd make it

That I'd make it, so I made it

I put my back into it, my heart in it

So I did it, yeah I did it

Don't fuck with my freedom

I came up to get me some

I'm nasty, I'm evil

Must be something in the water

Or that I'm my mother's daughter

Don't fuck with my freedom

Oh my God, oh my God

Don't fuck with my freedom

Oh my God, oh my God

Don't fuck with my freedom

Oh my God, oh my God

Don't fuck with my freedom

Oh my God, oh my God

Swish swish, motherfucker

>>11778883

believe them when they tell you

>Hallelujah, I'm a freak, I'm a freak

>Hallelujah, every day of the week

>I'mma do yeah, like I want ah

>I'mma Nile crocodile, a piranha

>Oh my God, she got the power

>Oh look at her, she got the power

>Hallelujah, I'mma witch, I'mma witch

>Hallelujah, I'mma witch, I'mma witch

>>11778883

i'm nasty i'm evil

https://youtu.be/lJX_NKemEEM

Miley Cyrus CRIES her eyes out for Hillary Clinton's LOSS to President Trump 😪😥😢😿

9,120 views•Nov 9, 2016

>>11778944

>>11778883

i'm nasty i'm evil and programmed to be a feminist robot

look at this complete propaganda including the tee shirt the host is wearing

https://youtu.be/-da_omOb4w4

>>11778956

>>11778944

>>11778883

what's with all the lefty crybaby hrc fems

it is really quite weird

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIPIvE9hgho

>>11778940

i know tone deaf to 2020 retard

>>11778940

this one frame by fram is just gross lesbo shit

and is stealing sounds from olivia newton john

lets get physical physical

every one of her new songs io stolen sound from the late seventies and eighties

https://youtu.be/0ir1qkPXPVM

>>11779020

>>11778940

nothing new under the sun

all is stolen

stevie nicks rip off

ooohh oooh just like the white winged dove

edge of seventeen

willl give it to her she does sound good doing this sound and her voice is good

but she is a broken broken person

https://youtu.be/aeVmeo7m1_Q

>>11779020

if you watch this frame by frame it is just gross