Baker:
Why the hell are there non-research posts in the notables?
Why the hell did you put clownshill shit in the notables?
You do realize that part of the clown's rant was how it how people were making empty posts about nothing important while being self-congratulatory, right… and then proceeded to do exactly the same thing while posting known clown-shill pics.
Pay attention, Baker.
In any case, Baker, you fell for an obvious divisive-shill, and it's obvious you yourself either haven't read Q posts or you don't actually trust the plan.
"Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: ff7ea4 614954
This is not about religions or party affiliation.
EVIL is everywhere.
There are no drawn lines.
No boundaries.
Good vs Evil.
Q"
Or did you forget the meaning of:
Where We Go One We Go All
?
If you want to know, Israel is on the list of places to be cleansed. Q is saving it for last.
Don't fall to shills.
Don't respond to clowns.
We probably have a dirty baker, which means splintering off.
There is absolutely no excuse to having non-research in the notables.
BAKER
I don't care how true you feel the clown's words are.
NOTABLES ARE FOR RESEARCH
YOU ARE ACTIVELY IMPEDING THE CAUSE BY MAKING TAKING UP SPACE IN NOTABLES THAT DOESN'T DIRECTLY LEAD TO RESEARCH
I'm still not replying directly to you, though, because you're a clown.
Do we have a backup backer?
BAKER
In case you haven't noticed, there's proof they're clowns right there. I haven't replied to a single one and they've managed to latch onto me regardless. I've spoken nothing of their points, refuted nothing, and simply called out the ludicrousness of having
STUFF THAT'S NOT RESEARCH IN THE NOTABLES
If you can't tell that you've fallen for a clown trap, then you've no business here.
I'd suggest it.
You've failed.
Neither of you should be namefagging for precisely the reason that the current baker failed:
namefagging breeds ego.
ego shuts down the brain from conflicting input.
ego means that you can be tricked and it's hard as fuck to make you realize you've been tricked.
I honestly can't believe you have the audacity to namefag on an anonymous board.
By the fruits of their labor, which is why anons should always be checking notables to make sure they:
Contain actual research.
Don't contain red-herrings.
Don't contain fakes.
A good baker doesn't just collect whatever anons tell him to collect and collect the past dough, they should at least look at the last dough to make sure the notables for the last one are right.
Great bakers will go further to check, but that's really dependent on time constraints.
If anons followed directions, they'd be posting the pastebin of their dough before they go and bake it.
This allows for every anon in the thread to be able to see the notables of the next dough, effectively destroying the gate between baker and baker than can cause clowns to slip in or influence unnoticed.
If everyone knows what the baker is going to do, then clowns have to manage to trick everyone..
The notables should always be checked to make sure that we don't have bad bakers.
Seriously. We are not your parents, we are not your teachers, we are not your siblings.
As far as your notables, go, you still have non-research in your pastebin.
https:// pastebin.com/LjAB05Db
Let me quite clear, anon:
I don't care what people talk about. I don't care about people engaging clowns, sliding threads or any of that shit. The smart ones will ignore clowns.
I don't care about what gets discussed. I am here for the Truth no matter what it looks like.
What I do care about is stuff that isn't research in the notables.
Tell me, how when an anon goes and clicks on
>1177 359
>11 77 576
That they'll be able to gather evidence to prove the veracity of the events/conspiracies transpiring?
>how do you propose that be accomplished when a bread lasts 45 minutes?
I didn't propose that every anon read the bread. I said that it ALLOWS for every anon to read the bread. Whether they will or not is besides the point but it's to provide opportunity before the actual next dough is posted.
And posting the pastebin of the next dough takes all of two seconds. Copy-paste.
45 minutes for a bread is actually extremely slow. Q response doughs recently have been lasting five minutes, if that, before another bread needs to be baked.
>Your proposal of pre-posting the dough sounds almost feasible in theory…
It worked in practice, too, when we wound up with the problem of anons handing it off to clown bakers.
In fact, we haven't had a real clown baker since, because we have been posting the future doughs in the breads. The strategy now, on the clowns part, has shifted to influencing the baker since they can't take control of the bread for long if they're problems with pasted doughs.
Whatever you believe about me is conjecture. I am anonymous and you will never see me namefag. Believe what you want, but unless you want to keep running into egotistical bakers who inevitably fall into the grips of clowns before a sensible anon fixes things, then you're going to have problem after problem.