The Flynn pardon should tell us a lot in my opinion. The biggest thing is the POTUS finally realizes the normal game is rigged and he won't win by that method even if overwhelming evidence is produced as they will just use one of their judges to block it like they did here and then use their media to create a narrative.

I am positive we know about 5% of what is really going on but if things are what I personally am convinced they are, I hope this is a sign that he plans to turn up the heat massively over the next 72 hours. Patterns always tell me the story and more often than not I am correct when I see them and piece them together. If correct in this regard I feel a major offensive move will take place within the next 48-72 hours and by "major" I mean extremely head turning. All the patterns point to it.

>>11786312

I can't. He worked under the Obama regime and was part of the same SS that was busted for that prostitution issue in South America. He may be on the level but I have no reason to trust him as I do not know him personally and only a fool would trust someone they do not know and do not have enough data to go on.

>>11786424

Not to blow myself but of the 32 predictions made over this entire time period, 27 have been correct so the patterns of things are more often correct than not. Of course you have no reason to buy that statement but it is factual none the less with most misses coming from predicted false flags which, frankly, may or may not have happened but were blocked by federal authorities so impossible to know. But at this point Trump patterns are very obvious to read as he always follows a similar method, post pattern and after decision pattern when something is brewing. In my opinion I expect something very big given the current timeline, the release of Flynn thus protecting him from a would be hostage situation, and the vote testimony today.

What it is I can only speculate but I do expect it. If I am wrong, so be it, but I am one of the most pessimistic people on this board/always have been so when I think something is coming it is from a logical standpoint and not one of some misdirected hope.

>>11786515

National Security threat.

>>11786583

More so, guilt by the fact that at this point we all know how these people work and the fact they only allow certain people into their circle, those they own or those who have long standing ties with them through one facet or another. He would never have been given access to Obama unless he was trusted or owned in some way and that is beyond dispute. Therefore, he cannot be trusted by me personally as I do not know him, the SS was a mess during his time period, and he worked under an administration which had a massive track record of blackmail control over its operatives which is incontrovertible.

Dan may very well be a good man, but I have no reason to trust a person I do not know and who worked under such a situation merely because he says some words I agree with. Only a fool would trust blindly.