lawfag here
this is a major disappointment
i can scan and absorb 100 pages of legal in minutes
already did
NOTHING new
NOTHING we have not already seen in the news
NOT ONE fucking faggot fact that isnt contested and refutable
No anons
if this is the silver bullet we been had by ms powell
just posted a moment ago
lawfag here
i fucking hope so
this is not impressive AT ALL
makes veritas pre-shilling look good
pathetic
no no no no
not even a tweet from powell
just cheked her twatter
massive fraud on us anons
say wut you will doubtfags
i know whats in there
and what is NOT
we been had if this is it
NO MOABS
NO BOMBSHELLS
NO DIRECT ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD AGAINST ANYONE
lawfag here
im tellin you anons this is not wut we expected
READ THIS here
NO allegation other than ACCESSED
no allegation they did SHIT
"MONITORED TO MANIPULATE ELECTIONS"
PLURAL!
THAT IS LAWSPEAK FOR NO PROOF OF THIS ELECTION
couldnt even spell the court correctly?
the very first fucking page?
here it is
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICCT COURT, NORTHERN
DISTRCOICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION
read it yourself faggot
talk to me when you done
im already done
its a POS
NO specific facts alleged
NONE
>No real lawyer would be able to do that without consideration of the laws and context
how little you know anon
i wish you were right and i was wrong
but im not
> we have to file an answer where we generally tear apart the legal argument in our response.
wrong
100% wrong
all the answer has to do is DENY everything
burden of proof is on plaintiff
its not abut legal arguments anon
its about the sum and substance of this complaint
complaints do NOT present law
complaints are only for allegations of FACTS
the facts alleged here are all like NEWS stories
that is the problem
plus the complaint does not even allege the status/residency etc (standing) of the plaintiffs which is required in every federal suit
again you NEVER refer to affadavits in as complaint
ok anons im working thru it
it was SUCH a non starter for lawfag didnt know where to begin
typos are not fatal ever
amendments are freely granted
but its shitty practice
REAL shitty
its federal
but that doesnt matter
MUST allege basis of jurisdiction and standing to sue
MISSING
>validate their statement
you all asked for reasons
i post them
this is unreal
the complaint is a big press release
CASE law?
no ok if a statute you allege is violated but not cases and even then it is for reference as the LAW is never alleged in a complaint which is "a concise statement of the FACTS entitled the pleader to relief"
see civil rules
no you do NOT
i cited the rule
it is called FACT based pleading
that is exactly what you allege in a complaint
FACTS
in contrast to LAW which the judge is presumed to know and is NOT to be plead in a complaint
that doesnt stop many lawyers from doing it but its wrong