Could some paralegal or other staff working with Sidney have tried to sabotage the filing by fucking up the header at the last minute? Has anyone tweeted her about it?
Is it a federal suit?
I don't mean to cast doubt on the work done here, but whey are there typos? Was it rushed?
p. 31
> it was if they were intended
for absentee use but had not been used for that purposes.
>There were no markings on the ballots to show where they
had com~ from
Understandable, but still a bit of a head-scratcher.
lol **why. I'm drunk, I have an excuse.
>we typically receive the machines, the ballot marking devices – on
the Friday before the election, with a chain of custody letter to be
signed on Sunday, indicating that we had received the machines and
the counts on the machines when received, and that the machines
have been sealed. In this case, *we were asked to sign the chain
of custody letter on Sunday, even though the machines were
not delivered until 2:00 AM in the morning on Election Day.*
Falsifying COC paperwork!
p. 35
>I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden. Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate ballot and was due to the use of different printers. Many ballots had markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot.