>DISTRCOICT
DISTRict
COurt
I
C
T
>Of course the shills focus on misspellings
Anons Focus On Interpretation
Is She Pointing To Connecticut?
Filings
Cases
Inter-court Investigations
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ct/criminal-division
U.S. Attorneys » District of Connecticut » About
Criminal Division
The Criminal Division, which is responsible for enforcing federal criminal laws, comprises four program-based units: National Security and Cybercrime, Major Crimes, Violent Crimes and Narcotics, and Financial Fraud and Public Corruption. Sarah P. Karwan is the Chief of the Criminal Division.
The National Security and Cybercrime Unit
The National Security and Cybercrime Unit is responsible for prosecuting matters involving international and domestic terrorism, customs enforcement and identity theft, and the rapidly expanding problem of sophisticated cybercrimes. Peter S. Jongbloed is the Chief of the Unit and Vanessa Richards is the Deputy Chief. The Unit also coordinates the District’s Anti-Terrorism Advisory Committee (ATAC).
District Court - International [F] & [D}- Connecticut
Watch The Fng Water Mark
THE WATER MARK….WAS REAL!!!!
PAGE 35 OF SYDNEY'S LAWSUIT!
COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf (defendingtherepublic.org)
Delta 1y
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/26/interesting-development-doj-requests-delay-in-flynn-case-until-after-publication-of-ig-report/
Interesting Development – DOJ Requests Delay in Flynn Case Until After Publication of IG Report…
Posted on November 26, 2019 by sundance
A curiously interesting development in the DOJ case against Michael Flynn. Judge Emmet Sullivan is weighing the merits of the Flynn defense Motion to Compel (MTC), which requests a significant amount of information on DOJ/FBI conduct in the lead-up to Flynn’s prosecution. A decision and court briefing was anticipated soon.
However, today the DOJ files a joint motion with the defense asking Judge Sullivan to suspend scheduled briefing dates and sentencing deadlines until after the DOJ inspector general report is published on December 9th. The implication is that some of the “Brady” material at issue; or tangential issues that touch upon the material; may be outlined in the upcoming IG report.