see this is just NOT how a complaint is drafted (normally)
the lawyer would allege the facts NOT what was declared in an affadavit
NO no no
this is not right
ok faggot you show me in this complaint the following items as set forth in the federal rules of civil procedure and i quote:
(a) Claim for Relief. A pleading that states a claim for relief must contain:
(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction, unless the court already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new jurisdictional support;
(2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; and
(3) a demand for the relief sought, which may include relief in the alternative or different types of relief.
Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading
that is because you live in a FAKE and gay world of corrupt lawyers and judges
that is why i quit in 2005 long before you drafted a single complaint
dont bother with #3 they make plenty of demands for relief
but 1 and 2 cannot be found in this document
wut you fial to realize is that GOOD lawyergin is exactly the same thing you describe for your job only with concepts and words
damn few of us old school lawyers left
100% bullshitters and con artists and that includes ms powell
OMG you faggots are brain dead
the answer simply DENIES each and every allegation - nothing more nothing less unless there is a counterclaim or affirmative defense
this so called complaint is a massive mess of stories designed for public consumption
im not saying the fuckery isnt true
im saying this complaint is no kraken
it aint even a clam
no actually a geoduck cuz its so fuking big
(and try to pronounce it right)
i dont give a fuck what stupid corrupt time and money wasting lawyers DO and the equally worthless judges the same
show me in the rules where that is permitted or even contemplated
you cant
a complaint is to plead FACTS not witness statement and not opinions
agreed
the hype for this filing was, to say the least, hyperbolic
perhaps you are one of the few real anons here
this is getting quite alarming
trump better have real proof from the SCIF in real time and no doubt about it
that is the ONLY context in which this pleading makes any sense
a huge PR and optics campaign to usher in real proof - here's hoping (again)
what evidence is needed to support this allegation?
>"cannot withstand criticisms"
its meaningless
the complain is supposed to allege FACTS so the court will RULE that the complained of process or conduct "cannot withstand criticisms"
my god we are all lost
>investigative report.
yes that is exactly what this is
it is NOT a legal complaint in any sense of the term