After reading the Georgia Kraken…

One of the biggest themes that struck me was affiants testifying that they were ASKED to break chain of custody laws for the voting machines.

[C]

[O]

[C]

[C]hain [O]f [C]ustody?

Did the Patriots weaponize spelling errors to not only get biased reporters to report the Georgia Kraken but ALSO provide code on directing people's attention to COC?

Michigan Kraken:

Spelling error omits an [i].

Biased reporters report the spelling error…and the code is the C_A was especially intimately involved in the Michigan voter fraud? Q has repeatedly, if I recall correctly, omitted the letter i in drops about the agency.

https://www.defendingtherepublic.org/

>>11795626

Or, for 'COC', it could refer to "Chain of Command".

Misspellings that produce "Chain of Command", and a missing i, in the first two Krakens, could be the Patriots way of saying…the country's voter fraud operation was controlled out of Langley?

>>11795646

That's incorrect.

The structure of the .pdf's released by Powell are NOT 'image scans'.

The easiest way to prove this is that you can highlight individual characters in the .pdf document. Anyone who has worked with .pdf's know that when you can highlight individual characters in a .pdf, those .pdf's are not the result of scanning to images, but they were typed out and saved that way.

>>11795647

>>11795652

>>11795626

Who else but the C_A could have such DETAILED KNOWLEDGE of exactly which cities and states as the 'smallest' number of cities and states to be targeted in order to 'flip' the nationwide election?

The first two Krakens to me paint a picture that the fraud was highly sophisticated and highly 'informed' about detailed vulnerabilities (blackmailable people, bribable people, 'on team' people, etc) in the 'system'.

I think the release of the 'Kraken' may have been the release of a military cyber warfare system TO EXPOSE THE AGENCY'S CYBER WARFARE they have been using against the American people for years with impunity.

COC and a missing i.

C_A was running the voter fraud operation?

>>11795616

>>11795738

To answer your question, the enemy is those who want to deflect our attention away from specific individual names of specific individual criminals, and towards entire religions and groups and collectives, TO DIVIDE THE GROUPS AGAINST EACH OTHER INSTEAD OF THE SOURCE OF THE DIVISION.

The enemy is you, not 17 million people neither you nor I have ever met in order to be able to make such a sweeping claim that applies to everyone of that group.

Neither you nor I need to 'condemn' entire religions or races in order to successfully target and prosecute criminal activity.

What you are doing is PREVENTING crime from being prosecuted by deflecting attention away from specific individuals committing specific individual crimes, which can be prosecuted, and towards condemning entire religions or races THAT CANNOT BE PROSECUTED BECAUSE THERE IS NO REFERENCE OF SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL PEOPLE COMMITTING SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL CRIMES.

You can't shove into people's faces your beliefs about an entire religion or race, and expect anyone to successfully prosecute crimes.

Crimes are committed by individua, people, not abstract conceptions like religions or races.

You can't identify any criminals if all you do is focus your attention on aggregates and groups and abstract concepts that don't identify any specific individuals as committing crimes.

This is why you morons are always called 'shills'. You are shilling for the Satanists who WANT religions divided and races divided.

You are the enemy on this board. You are not anyone's saviors. You are evil.

>>11795822

Not all Catholics, not all Jews, not all Muslims, not all Democrats, not all Republicans, not all black people, not all white people, not all Men, not all women.

FOCUS ON SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS TO EXPOSE CRIMES, REGARDLESS OF THEIR 'GROUP' AFFILIATION.

>>11795888

>We goyim

For all anyone knows you could be an Iranian goat fucker or a Chicom baby eater trying to divide kikes and crackers.

Hey cool story: Did you know that without sauce, your attacks that divide people by 'groups' always always always reveals you to be working for the very enemy Q is taking down?

Well, you probably won't know that given most of you are fucking low IQ degenerates who couldn't shill your way out of a paper bag, but just know that you aren't 'representing' anyone expect your disgusting self.

>>11795940

>OK I get it

Preface your statement with 'this is my theory', and you won't look like a retard.

>>11795950

Guess I can add you sucking at infiltration too.

For all anyone knows you could be a bible hater TRYING TO SMEAR Judaism and Christianity by associating the bible with your own Marxist collectivist garbage that divides people by big groups.

You can't shill with such low IQ.

>>11796004

If you actually knew the bible you would have known and acknowledged Revelation 3:9 that specifically and explicitly excluded Jews as the enemy. "The blasphemy of those who say they are Jews but are not".

Jesus explicitly said it's not the Jews, but the Satanists.

It must suck having a low IQ.