Anonymous ID: 843ffe Nov. 26, 2020, 8:42 a.m. No.11796050   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Another Affiant testified about the use of different paper for ballots,

that would constitute fraud stating:

I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.

Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the

watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of

transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I

challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate

ballot and was due to the use of different printers. Many ballots had

markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot.

(See Attached hereto, Exh. 20, Aff of Debra J. Fisher, at pars. 4, 5, 6).

Anonymous ID: 843ffe Nov. 26, 2020, 8:46 a.m. No.11796109   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>11796083

Yup probably is. Heed the warning. Faggot ass shills that try to discredit by name fagging is a red flag.

 

The fraud was executed by many means,2 but the most fundamentally

troubling, insidious, and egregious is the systemic adaptation of old-fashioned

“ballot-stuffing.” It has now been amplified and rendered virtually invisible

by computer software created and run by domestic and foreign actors for that

very purpose. Mathematical and statistical anomalies rising to the level of

impossibilities, as shown by affidavits of multiple witnesses, documentation,

and expert testimony evince this scheme across the state of Georgia.

Especially egregious conduct arose in Forsyth, Paulding, Cherokee, Hall, and

Barrow County. This scheme and artifice to defraud affected tens of

thousands of votes in Georgia alone and “rigged” the election in Georgia for

Joe Biden.

 

2 50 USC § 20701 requires Retention and preservation of records and papers by officers of

elections; deposit with custodian; penalty for violation, but as will be shown wide pattern of

misconduct with ballots show preservation of election records have not been kept; and

Dominion logs are only voluntary, with no system wide preservation system.