#15056: Fake Anons And Their Fake "Notables For Baker" Edition

Anons I was posting the actual body or portions of articles that made the prior notables in the prior bread to this one,these articles only had the title and the link no content.I was not trying to get notables off of someone else’s notable. I don’t care about that, what I care is by anons not posting the content or at least a few paragraphs of the articles, they force curious and avid reading anons to leave the board to find out the point of important info that is not in the title I’ve been posting portions of the article because it’s courteous to anons, they’re time and attention, and the anon that posted it should be able to defend why the article is notable. So if the title of this bread is an insinuation, then you haven’t seen I’ve been pointing this out for weeks and why is this acceptable research? And I don’t understand how Bakers can believe it’s notable without reading the content.

one notable below only had the title and link, there were three simple paragraphs in the article that explained what people should do; the anon could have posted but didn’t, so I did. how hard is to capture three paragraphs, unless you’re not reading the article at all?

>>11793620 3 things to prepare for when President Trump is declared the winner

Titles of articles are done by journalists to get attention and draw people in to read it, many times its emotional manipulation triggers. Why are anons not doing the work if they read the article they should post some content?

Doing this doesn’t make that anon accountable for supporting his research, nor do I think bakers are reading the articles while baking, so how do they determine notability? It seems to be a way of posting in the goal of getting notables. This is not to say they shouldn’t be notable, but why make all of take our attention off the board and work extra harder when you could have done it?

Please anons if your going to post articles, put some of the content in the board so we don’t have to leave 10-15 times each thread to read itAnd yes in some cases there’s more that 15 notables on each thread with title and link only.

For Now, US Troops Won't Be Required to Get New COVID-19 Vaccine

23 Nov 2020

Military.com | By Patricia Kime

As the U.S. Food and Drug Administration weighs whether to issue an emergency use authorization for a coronavirus vaccine, Defense Department officials say the inoculations will remain voluntary once the FDA gives the OK.

Preparations are underway across the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs to receive doses of a COVID-19 vaccine once the FDA issues an emergency authorization for use, possibly as early as mid-December.

But as the two departments sort out the details on who should receive the vaccine and where, DoD officials stressed it will not be mandatory for U.S. service members, at least for a while.

According to officials, the vaccine will remain voluntary as long as it is authorized under emergency conditions and doesn't have official approval from the FDA.

In a town hall forum earlier this month, Air Force Col. Jessica Spitler, 30th Medical Group commander, said everyone who requests the vaccine will be required to give informed consent to receive it – meaning they must speak with their doctor specifically about the immunization and agree to get it.

It will remain voluntary as long as it is not officially approved by the FDA – a process that could take 18 months to two years, she added.

"We don't know the details of the legal considerations but we are expecting to get that soon," Spitler said during a Vandenberg Air Force Base town hall meeting Nov. 6.

DoD officials confirmed the decision to Military.com on Friday.

"It is expected that these vaccines will be voluntary until achieving full FDA approval," said Lou Burton, chief of media operations for the Air Force Surgeon General.

Pfizer and BioNTech filed an emergency use authorization request for its vaccine candidate, paving the way to possibly receive approval on Dec. 10, when the FDA's Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meets to review the request.

VA and DoD are preparing to receive doses of the vaccine as allocated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

During the Vandenberg town hall, Col. Anthony Mastalir, 30th Space Wing commander, said the base is slated to receive up to 10,000 doses of the Pfizer vaccine once it receives emergency use authorization.

A VA nurse in the Philadelphia area, who asked that her name not be used because she was not authorized to speak with the press, also said she was told her facility would receive the Pfizer vaccine when it becomes available for staff members and high-risk patients.

VA Press Secretary Christina Noel said Friday that no VA facilities currently have the vaccine, but the department is working "diligently, both internally and externally with its CDC partners, to develop a comprehensive plan" to ensure that it is available across the system, first to high-risk veterans and staff.

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/11/23/now-us-troops-wont-be-required-get-new-covid-19-vaccine.html