https://twitter.com/DilbyDoe/status/1332158054784266240
Twitter is censoring this old video of CNN actually covering Smartmatic and the corrupt Chavez election back in the day.
Not an argument, no sauce, did not disprove it's the Satanists, copypasta garbage.
Shaddap
Teach your children the truth about Marxism
Leszek Kolakowski's 3 volume masterwork of his CRITIQUE OF MARXISM AS TYRANNICAL in "Main Currents of Marxism":
https://gofile.io/d/LNyVpH
Robert Tucker's "Philosophy and Myth in Karl Marx:
http://www.bard.edu/library/arendt/pdfs/Tucker-Marx.pdf
George Reisman's discovery that PROFITS, NOT WAGES IS THE 'ORIGINAL' MONETARY INCOME in human civilization:
https://mises.org/library/classical-economics-vs-exploitation-theory
Murray Rothbard's explanation that MARXISM IS A SECULARISED RELIGION:
https://mises.org/library/karl-marx-religious-eschatologist
Ludwig Von Mises' explanation on how MARX ATTACKED HUMAN REASON itself in order to pave way for his system to be adopted:
https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/656
Ludwig Von Mises' discovery of DIVISIVE LOGIC INHERENT IN MARXISM:
https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/657
________
Anon's 2 most important things to know about Marxism
Religious: Marxism is derived from a dialectic in Creatology that imputes to "The One"/"God"/"Geist"/etc an inner DIVISION, an inner 'schism', an inner 'uneasiness', an inner 'conflict', that 'needed' the creation of the empirical universe to make itself whole through the historical process, whereby the path to "wholeness"/"completeness"/"fulfillment"/etc is through a history of good vs. evil until at last there occurs an 'inevitable' cataclysmic apocalypse of maximum depravity, pain, and destruction, after which the 'historical process' will have finally 'worked itself out', and humanity will have finally 'reabsorbed' back with "The One"/"God"/"Geist", and Humanity will itself become permanently fractured and cleaved into two 'species', a demonic global 'elite' controlling the lives of the remainder of the world species.
[This is contrasted with orthodox Judaism/Christianity/Islam that holds the event of Creation was an event of God's Love and Benevolence for his creations (humanity). Imagine the differences that can occur in social relations between a world where people believed HUMANITY is DIVIDED, and a world where people believed HUMANITY is UNITED! THIS is the battle being waged in the plan of 'The Great Reset']
Economic: Marxism is derived from a false description of the origination of money incomes in human civilization. Marx, following Adam Smith, believed that in the "early and rude state of society", if there ever was such a time, that the very first monetary incomes earned were wages, and that later on with the introduction of people acting in the capacity of "capitalists", there was a reduction in wages and introduction of profits. This is the conceptual framework of Marx's exploitation theory which is what EVERY Marxist institution depends on and takes for granted as true. The reality is that PROFITS were the first monetary income. In the "early and rude state of society" people made products directly from the material world around them, and sold them as commodities. The monetary incomes earned on the sale of commodities is product sales revenues, not wages. Since there were originally no money costs of production, all of the sales revenues were profit. Then, once people became wealthy enough and saved money for investment, instead of using it to consume right away, money began being used to pay people not for their commodities, which requires land and means of production of their own, but for only their labor. This was the onset of wages. Wages represented a monetary cost to DEDUCT from product sales revenues, which used to be all profit, but was now less than 100% by whatever extent wages were paid.
[Imagine if the world knew the reality that the rise of capitalism was in fact the end of the all profit era and beginning of the wage earning class era, that the rise in capitalism brought about a FALL in profit incomes, not the other way around as per Marx!]
>Divides by religion
SATANIC DIVISION SCRIPT [SHILL WHINE]™ LOGIC FAIL: DIVIDES HUMANITY BY RELIGION
[Slander - Aggression]
Q
Activate division shill script
[Last Name, First Name] is a ==[Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, …}], committed {Sin{crime}}.
I mention [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }}] because "it's a fact" that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].
You need to read my words repeating that a person is nothing but a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, …}]. Keep [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] in your mind, because that is a 'damning fact' that you cannot deny.
Any attempt to question me for repeating the fact that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code rules is to call YOU a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] person trying to defend [Last Name, First Name].
As I said before, [Last Name, First Name] being a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] is a fact. Everyone needs to mentally juxtapose [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] to a person, because it is a fact.
I am totally not trying to divide anyone by race or religion or class or political affiliation, oh no, if YOU perceive what I write about [Last Name, First Name] being [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] as me trying to increase division by repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], then my shill code rule is to accuse you of 'failing to disprove' the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], and then my shill code is to reduce you to 'a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] shill trying to defend [Last Name, First Name] who is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].
So to reiterate, since it is a fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], there can never be any nefarious intent behind my merely stating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], there is nothing deceitful going on in my repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].
Now to be sure, if you question me specifically whether I will admit that there is [Last Name, First Name (z1)] who are not [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], yes, I will admit that, BUT, even this does not disprove the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].
So on free speech boards like this one, any other poster who challenges me for pointing out the 'damning information' that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code is to dismiss all of them as themselves [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] who are only saying what they're saying to distract me and others from pointing out the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].
Sauce please.
When you realize Anons recognize you as needing symbolism.
Prove it's real.
Burden of proof is on not on anyone to 'disprove', it's on you to prove.
It's illogical to demand for proof of a negative.
Try harder.
Prove the quote is real.
Anons have been waiting for 3.5 years for you to prove it. Zilch ever since.