>>11801610 (pb)

>Snowden's alleged request for a conditional surrender

Why should a treasonous cia mole, who tried to bring the nsa down to allow (Heil Hydra!) cia take over its portfolio, be allowed to spread moar poisonous dis and misinformation during a public trial?? Makes no sense.

Can any lawfag or anon explain why the Exhibits to the MI complaint jump from "Exhibit 10" to "Exhibit 101"? Is Sidney just leaving "placeholder" Exhibit Nos. for additional affidavits in an "amended complaint"? In 30+ years of lawfagging I've never seen this unless the complaint is just an unfinalized draft, and Sidney sure sounded like she was under the gun to get something "public" if not actually "filed" by midnight Wednesday.