Anonymous ID: 318ca5 Nov. 26, 2020, 9:04 p.m. No.11803287   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3409 >>3413

Does anyone know a good reason why Trump would want to get rid of Section 230?

 

What would it mean for Social Media companies that cannot/will not regulate speech on their platforms with the kind of (((AI))) and (((algorithms))) that BigTech can afford?

 

I don't understand. One side says it will help us fight BigTech, the other says it will legally annihilate sites like BitChute and Gab which we need

Anonymous ID: 318ca5 Nov. 26, 2020, 9:42 p.m. No.11803787   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3795 >>3796 >>3809

>>11803573

What he's saying is this: Getting rid of 230 will indeed eliminate BigTech liability protections, but it doesn't just affect BigTech. It affects ALL TECH.

 

AltTech can't afford the lawsuits that would be waged against them if their protection is removed. BigTech can, because they have the money and the ability to rebrand themselves as publishers.

 

If a free speech platform loses its liability protections, that means they will become prime targets for all sorts of legal bullshit their jews can come up with.

 

That is, at least, what I think Torba is saying