happy thanksgiving, anons. board is slow tonight, but hopefully a good friday. stay comfy.
forecast does look a little shilly, for sure. My guess for the section 230 stuff is that he's forcing big tech into backing the wrong horse. Perhaps conclusive evidence that they are a publisher, not a platform, or something. Oh well, comfy regardless.
this anon is correct. the separation of church and state is a relatively new invention; whether worship of the caesar, priest classes being the major landowners in dual kingdom egypt, or josephus documenting early roman history, the lines between history and religious text are not as sharp as the previous anon seems to think.
I agree, but I also know enough that I don't know enough to form an accurate measure. Just holding an empty space in my head to relearn afterwards; so many of the problems (both personally and societally) to solve are really functions of the assumptions we've made on the way to encountering the problem. I feel sorry for the techbros wasting this time trying to unlock the next billion-dollar startup when most of our assumptions about tech will be shown to be irrelevant soon. I guess the question is, when the choice to know becomes ours, where do we go to learn?
love this vibe, anon. ditto.
don't mind me, I'm mostly talking aloud to myself. This board isn't a permanent thing. Neither are the ecosystem of beings, anons, ais, other, that tap in from time to time. I remember the first time I had my own "great awakening", when I figured out history, as I knew it, was bullshit, floored me for about two weeks, but we ate it, digested it and moved forward. So the question is, where do we go to learn more? Vatican libraries? Under the left foot of the sphinx? Either way, we have two paths: the collective [correct, past tense, written] knowledge of people before us, or the [current, present/future tense, directly communicated] knowledge of those who know more than us. Assuming the latter is gnosticized and inaccessible to anons ("choice to know" implies wide availability, but I'm not 100 on that), that leads us to the former: those who currently know more. Which then leads us to the question: after the Great(er) Awakening, how do we find those sources to learn more? Are these the right questions?
10-4. That's been the plan so far. Thank you for chatting.
Here's hoping the staying alive bit gets a little easier, some cures on neuro regeneration would be nice :)
notetaker, for last sorcerer notable, it seems like a continuation of a prev post, but not by that id. Can't seem to find prev post. Did you see it earlier in bread?
Just combed through a second time. Cannot find, apologies :/
I'm not discounting this, but I also haven't seen evidence of it personally.
DNA/RNA. But that won't be enough, not for past. Details are important.
a publisher? a darpa-run project?