Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 27, 2020, 9:53 a.m. No.11808573   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8778 >>8791 >>8916 >>8978 >>9229 >>9344

Near Instantly Deleted John Hopkins study on COVID-19 (COVID-19 had no effect on the % of deaths of older people, did not increase total deaths in America)

 

John Hopkins University study that found COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, and it has also has not increased the total number of deaths in America—a study John Hopkins University near instantly deleted before it was censored—but one knows they knew would be quickly copied so others could read it in its entirety and see the truth for themselves:

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20201126223119/https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19

 

Sauce:

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index3404.htm

https://notthebee.com/article/a-few-days-ago-johns-hopkins-published-a-study-saying-corona-is-nbd-they-then-deleted-it-read-it-here-in-its-entirety

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 27, 2020, 10:04 a.m. No.11808655   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8657 >>8978 >>9229 >>9344

Landmark legal ruling that found Covid tests are not fit for purpose and are basically worthless (97% unreliable)

 

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/507937-covid-pcr-test-fail/

 

By Peter Andrews, Irish science journalist and writer based in London. He has a background in life sciences, and graduated from the University of Glasgow with a degree in genetics.

 

Four German holidaymakers who were illegally quarantined in Portugal after one was judged to be positive for Covid-19 have won their case, in a verdict that condemns the widely-used PCR test as being up to 97-percent unreliable.

 

Earlier this month, Portuguese judges upheld a decision from a lower court that found the forced quarantine of four holidaymakers to be unlawful. The case centred on the reliability (or lack thereof) of Covid-19 PCR tests.

 

The verdict, delivered on November 11, followed an appeal against a writ of habeas corpus filed by four Germans against the Azores Regional Health Authority. This body had been appealing a ruling from a lower court which had found in favour of the tourists, who claimed that they were illegally confined to a hotel without their consent. The tourists were ordered to stay in the hotel over the summer after one of them tested positive for coronavirus in a PCR test - the other three were labelled close contacts and therefore made to quarantine as well.

 

Unreliable, with a strong chance of false positives

 

The deliberation of the Lisbon Appeal Court is comprehensive and fascinating. It ruled that the Azores Regional Health Authority had violated both Portuguese and international law by confining the Germans to the hotel. The judges also said that only a doctor can “diagnose” someone with a disease, and were critical of the fact that they were apparently never assessed by one.

 

They were also scathing about the reliability of the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, the most commonly used check for Covid.

 

The conclusion of their 34-page ruling included the following: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

 

In the eyes of this court, then, a positive test does not correspond to a Covid case. The two most important reasons for this, said the judges, are that, “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used’’ and that “the test’s reliability depends on the viral load present.’’ In other words, there are simply too many unknowns surrounding PCR testing.

 

cont part 2

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 27, 2020, 10:04 a.m. No.11808657   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8978 >>9229 >>9344

>>11808655

 

part 2

 

Tested positive? There could be as little as a 3% chance it’s correct

 

This is not the first challenge to the credibility of PCR tests. Many people will be aware that their results have a lot to do with the number of amplifications that are performed, or the ‘cycle threshold.’ This number in most American and European labs is 35–40 cycles, but experts have claimed that even 35 cycles is far too many, and that a more reasonable protocol would call for 25–30 cycles. (Each cycle exponentially increases the amount of viral DNA in the sample).

 

Earlier this year, data from three US states – New York, Nevada and Massachusetts – showed that when the amount of the virus found in a person was taken into account, up to 90 percent of people who tested positive could actually have been negative, as they may have been carrying only tiny amounts of the virus.

 

The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”

 

While the judges in this case admitted that the cycle threshold used in Portuguese labs was unknown, they took this as further proof that the detention of the tourists was unlawful. The implication was that the results could not be trusted. Because of this uncertainty, they stated that there was "no way this court would ever be able to determine" whether the tourist who tested positive was indeed a carrier of the virus, or whether the others had been exposed to it.

 

I’m an epidemiology professor and I have some genuine concerns about the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine. Here’s why… I’m an epidemiology professor and I have some genuine concerns about the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine. Here’s why… I’m an epidemiology professor and I have some genuine concerns about the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine. Here’s why…

 

Sshhh – don’t tell anyone

 

It is a sad indictment of our mainstream media that such a landmark ruling, of such obvious and pressing international importance, has been roundly ignored. If one were making (flimsy) excuses for them, one could say that the case escaped the notice of most science editors because it has been published in Portuguese. But there is a full English translation of the appeal, and alternative media managed to pick it up.

 

And it isn’t as if Portugal is some remote, mysterious nation where news is unreliable or whose judges are suspect – this is a western EU country with a large population and a similar legal system to many other parts of Europe. And it is not the only country whose institutions are clashing with received wisdom on Covid. Finland’s national health authority has disputed the WHO’s recommendation to test as many people as possible for coronavirus, saying it would be a waste of taxpayer’s money, while poorer South East Asian countries are holding off on ordering vaccines, citing an improper use of finite resources.

 

Testing, especially PCR testing, is the basis for the entire house of cards of Covid restrictions that are wreaking havoc worldwide. From testing comes case numbers. From case numbers come the ‘R number,’ the rate at which a carrier infects others. From the ‘dreaded’ R number comes the lockdowns and the restrictions, such as England’s new and baffling tiered restrictions that come into force next week.

 

The daily barrage of statistics is familiar to us all by this point, but as time goes on the evidence that something may be deeply amiss with the whole foundation of our reaction to this pandemic – the testing regime – continues to mount.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 27, 2020, 10:21 a.m. No.11808785   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8793 >>8820

>>11808767

www.careerexplorer.com/careers/intelligence-analyst/salary/

Intelligence analysts earn an average yearly salary of $76,601. Wages typically start from $41,317 and go up to $142,018

Probably not with that guaranteed paycheck every two weeks

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 27, 2020, 10:33 a.m. No.11808883   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8924

>>11808866

>That’s some real dumb shit.

digits confirm

and they can always play that, "plausible deniability" card when needed

It is shameful that there are cowards who would allow this great nation to crumble for the sake of job security.

Our forefather's would have had them all strung on on the lightposts by now

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 27, 2020, 10:37 a.m. No.11808923   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11808871

Flynn follows a lot of people, and there seems to be some that think that's a really good thing, and others that think opposite in some cases. I will say this. Anyone that actually offers prayer with some sort of divine promise like healing or otherwise, and is charging for that, is a piece of shit in my book. If he's stopped doing all that, fine. His decodes are pretty good, but that might be because of his background; whatever that may be.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 27, 2020, 10:46 a.m. No.11808988   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9015

>>11808967

That is why DJT constantly pushes American exception and patriotism

Our government has been infiltrated by the enemy and our POTUS constantly calls them out.

The choice will be theirs - but when the dust settles, America will win !

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 27, 2020, 10:51 a.m. No.11809021   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9022 >>9233 >>9347

Drain the swamp

 

List details federal jobs stripped of extraordinary protections

President Trump's plan 'changes the game' for elite federal workers

Published November 26, 2020 at 3:39pm

 

By Philip Wegmann

Real Clear Politics

 

Three words (contracted to two) made Donald Trump famous: “You’re fired.” They defined his celebrity on reality television, and they could now make him infamous among career civil servants who normally enjoy legal protections that make it extremely difficult to remove them from their posts.

 

The president signed an executive order last month creating a new class of federal worker; it encompasses career staff involved in “confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating.” Such workers, now categorized as “Schedule F,” have been stripped of job protections that previously covered most federal employees. As a result, they can be fired much more easily.

 

More than creating a new bureaucratic classification, the move gives the president greater freedom to go after the so-called “deep state” career civil servants that he said hamstrung his term in office. He ordered government agencies in October to review their employees and report back with lists of “Schedule F” employees no later than Jan. 19, the eve of Inauguration Day.

 

The Office of Management and Budget has completed its task, RealClearPolitics has learned. According to an internal memo, OMB Director Russ Vought has classified 88% of that agency’s workforce, 425 employees, as Schedule F.

 

“Under President Trump’s leadership, we are committed to full accountability of policy making officials, as Congress intended, and implementing merit principles,” Vought told RCP. “This is another step to make Washington accountable to the American people.” Accountability, in this sense, means being subject to termination.

 

Of the more than 2 million federal employees, only about 4,000 are political appointees. They come and go with each administration, and they can be hired or fired at will. The rest are career civil servants. They can only be fired through an appeals-based process that critics complain is too time-consuming and complicated. Schedule F, one White House aide explained, “changes the game.”

 

It is a much broader category and could potentially include everyone from regulators and managers to economists and scientists. The order could be rescinded once President-elect Biden takes office, but the OMB action is the latest in an ongoing effort to make career positions more accountable to the executive. Trump has been regularly frustrated by those he describes as the “bad people” who inhabit the "deep state" thwarting his policy moves for the past four years. Despite the election results, the administration is moving forward with what public-sector unions and critics fear could be a blood-letting.

 

Senate Democrats introduced a bill Friday to block the executive order. Its sponsor, Gary Peters of Michigan, said the order would “not only strip protections away from hard-working, dedicated civil servants,” but also create “chaos and dysfunction during the ongoing pandemic and Presidential transition.”

 

His move was largely a symbolic gesture. The legislation isn’t expected to advance, and Democrats are powerless to stop the new classification and possible purge as Trump prepares to exit the White House.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 27, 2020, 10:54 a.m. No.11809038   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9054

>>11809015

>The George Bush Center for Suicidal Silence and Mass Mayhem Stupidity.

nice

liking the terms "cowardice" and traitor" myself

I can smell the fear and taste the panic, just waiting to hear the REEEEing

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 27, 2020, 11:28 a.m. No.11809308   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11808321 (lb)

"Blah blah $MEME made us laugh blah blah"

This tells me it's likely fake. Same pattern exhibit by the alleged "CIA anon" 4chan larp a short while ago.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 27, 2020, 11:39 a.m. No.11809422   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9444

>>11809383

>30 yrs of Israelis zionist lies about Iran

Also 30 years of complete domination of US policy and no attack on Iran

You now find yourself with a mindfuck

How do you conquer it?