>>11819713

> I’m convinced the emergence of the movement was a natural, opposite, and equal reaction

reaction was natural, but what did it lead to? passitivity, resist from outside, instead of using the system of represenatative gov to change from within, drug use, hippies, broken families, womans lib.

AND that entire generation tolerating the same from their children.

That began the generation when parents stopped preparing kids, teaching them life lessons, and disciplining them.

So after JFK and the hippie gen this was their plan.

–inflitrate gov legally from within, as media and culture pushed the generation to resist and not get involved (stand down)

–take over all institutions, all govs and education to control the children of the hippie generation who will stand down and not challenge the control, since they will be preoccupied resisting, and focus on instant gratification and entertainment, they will look upon media and school replacing a family value system as a benefit to them, so they do not have to.

>>11819808

kek

>>11819706

the correspondent/reporter who covered the MI senate hearing, and who was at the DC march recently is one to watch.

two red flags that rsbn could be comped

1-when marjorie taylor greene spoke the older thinning guy mentioned above was heard as if he was scrambling to ensure they cut away and they did, MTG i believe was a legit invited speaker. they cut her off for nothing, just when she started.

2-rsbn did cover alex jones who i believe was not invited, set up a defacto speaking area and is a disinfofag rallying people for a revolution. (not his place)

>>11819939

a win win for them, let them get away with it, biden in, or not.

i do think they wanted potus to declare victory first and rally the insurgents as the fraud came in showing biden pulling ahead.

for us though we planned all our tactics to arrive at the present, and i think we have a major advantage with rule of law, and enough public support to win.

>>11819975

dems will ask and globalists will push, but the un sec council even with not recognizing a potus nay likely will have a vetoing member (maybe russia, maybe moar)

at this point Un army counts on donors from nations and diplomacy with key nations can prevent a un effort to proceed, hopefully.

potus has done great on the world stage to avoid a problem like a un, eu, or china invasion being supported, if it habbens it will not be with great support, and if britain plays the wrong card maybe we liberate canada from the crown.

>>11820437

>Something's about to break me feelz

If AG Barr as chair ordered a lic review on nov 4 re. E2020 fuggery (present+past) then action may be able to be taken around dec 4 or 5th.

The EO on election interference has a timeline of 45 days from 11.3 for an assessment. Done in 30– would be huge here….

Good scenario would be for SC to look at case which could include the DNI threat assessment of election as well as the 30 day Lic review of [F] influence in the telecommunications sector (media), coupled with the domestic fraud that will be alot of evidence to look at in rigging an election.

(c) The Attorney General shall serve as Chair of the Committee (Chair).

Sec. 7. Threat Analysis by the Director of National Intelligence. (a) For each license or application reviewed by the Committee, the Director of National Intelligence shall produce a written assessment of any threat to national security interests of the United States posed by granting the application or maintaining the license. The Director of National Intelligence shall solicit and incorporate the views of the Intelligence Community, as appropriate.

(b) The analysis required under subsection (a) of this section shall be provided to the Committee within the earlier of 30 days from the date on which the Chair determines that an applicant’s or licensee’s responses to any questions and requests for information from the Committee are complete or 30 days from the date on which the Chair requests such an analysis.