>>11817571 /pb

>No mortal has figured out women.

I disagree. It's simple really, but even women have a problem figuring themselves out. The basic gist is that the feminine essence is a motif on yin/emptiness/context but all of the attempts to describe the essence of women come up short because they try to describe some essential content or thing you can point at.

There is a similar situation in the half-full/half-empty glass idea between optimism and pessimism. Say you have a glass of water and an empty glass. What is the latter? Just an EMPTY glass OR a complete GLASS itself. Don't miss the forest for the trees. That's not only the essential aspect of understanding women, but also of understanding the feminine in men.