>>>11825302
>
>This banner has nothing to do with Q Research, Q or anons that post here.
Just about every bread today with this statement, Whats really going on? Why spend your time complaining..where has it gotten you? Why does this bother you so much?
Dominion Exec Eric Coomer — ‘Don’t worry, Trump’s not gonna win, I made F-ing sure of that!’
Joe Oltmann, the founder of FEC (Faith Education Commerce) United, spoke to OAN about how he participated in a September 27 conference with members of antifa, and allegedly made a chilling discovery about a key member of the leadership of Dominion Voting Systems. Oltmann paraphrased Eric Coomer’s response: “Don’t worry about the election, Trump’s not gonna win. I made f-ing sure of that!”
Oltmann said he learned that “Eric from Dominion,” whom he later identified as Dominion employee Eric Coomer, would be on the call. According to Oltmanna, someone on the call asked, “What are we gonna do if f*ing Trump wins?” Oltmann paraphrased Coomer’s alleged response: “Don’t worry about the election, Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*ing sure of that!”
Not complaining.. and happen to like the new and improved banner, as far as the old one goes..there is a defined purpose why it keeps getting put up.. have an idea.. waiting to see if the poster of that particular on will come clean.. doubtful but worth a shot.
He's part of Antifa..Dominion, thinking this guy isn't going to find it easy to hide. Thinking those who have generously paid him will find ways to make sure he doesn't speak. He was also invited to PA, but a no show..anyone's guess where he is at the moment.
Pennsylvania judge says plaintiffs have 'viable claim' that state mail-in ballot rule was illegal
Lawsuit has argued that the Pennsylvania legislature's rule change was unconstitutional. (Act 77)
A state judge in Pennsylvania is upholding her earlier injunction against the state's certification of the 2020 election results, stating that a lawsuit alleging the unconstitutionality of a state ballot rule is "likel[y] to succeed" on its own merits. In the ruling Friday nights , Judge Patricia McCullough stipulated that her earlier temporary injunction against the state's elecion certification process was valid and should be enforced. The lawsuit on which McCullough made the initial injunction argued that the Pennsylvania legislature's Act 77, passed last year, "contravene[d] the requirements of the Pennsylvania Constitution." That act, the petitioners claimed, constituted "an attempt by the legislature to fundamentally overhaul the Pennsylvania voting system and permit universal, no-excuse, mail-in voting absent any constitutional authority," as McCullough summarized the petitioners' argument in her Friday ruling.
The petitioners, McCullough writes in the ruling, "appear to have established a likelihood to succeed on the merits because Petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment." The Pennsylvania Department of State's office on Tuesday announced that it had certified the presidential and vice presidential election results in Pennsylvania, though McCullough in her ruling noted that there were numerous steps to be taken to officially finalize that certification in state records. "[T]he emergency preliminary injunction was properly issued," the ruling states, "and should be upheld pending an expedited emergency evidentiary hearing."
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/pennsylvania-judge-says-plaintiffs-have-viable-claim-state-mail-ballot-rule
https://legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Kelly-v.-Pennsylvania-Injunction-Halting-Certification-Memorandum-Opinion-Filed-11-27-2020.pdf
https://www.media.pa.gov/pages/State-details.aspx?newsid=435