Anonymous ID: ccabf9 Nov. 29, 2020, 12:53 a.m. No.11826854   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6861 >>6891 >>6978 >>7001 >>7014 >>7050

>>11826833 pb

>You’re supposed to provide sources for your claims, not state something then tell anons ‘go look for yourself’

 

oh right. let me hook up a scanner and scan a few hundred pages from a textbook and upload them for you.

yessir, right a way sir. would you like me to come over and wipe your ass for you too?

GFY you lazy fucking jizzbreath fuckwad.

Anonymous ID: ccabf9 Nov. 29, 2020, 1:17 a.m. No.11826929   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7056

>>11826891

>a quote from My chemistry college professor

 

then why don't you go pester him? i bet he runs the other way at the sight of you.

listen, i named two sources, ones that MIGHT not be too far over your head for you to understand.

if your really want to know badly enough, you'll exert the effort to locate them. wiki is online, and i glanced at the article, and it is accurate in the limited info it provides.

if your fragile little ego can't handle the possibility that some people possess knowledge FAR beyond your feeble ability to comprehend, go back to YT.

YOU were the one asking questions. like i said before, i can't give you a PhD level of understanding in 25 words or less.

if my answers don't satisfy you, you can

A - invest a lifetime of study to become my scholarly equal

B - believe what i tell you , because i was GENEROUS to offer my expertise and i have ZERO possible incentive to lie

C - go fuck yourself

i don't care which.

Anonymous ID: ccabf9 Nov. 29, 2020, 1:33 a.m. No.11826988   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7014 >>7254 >>7580

>>11826978

listen, i named two sources, ones that MIGHT not be too far over your head for you to understand.

if your really want to know badly enough, you'll exert the effort to locate them. wiki is online, and i glanced at the article, and it is accurate in the limited info it provides.

if your fragile little ego can't handle the possibility that some people possess knowledge FAR beyond your feeble ability to comprehend, go back to YT.

YOU were the one asking questions. like i said before, i can't give you a PhD level of understanding in 25 words or less.

if my answers don't satisfy you, you can

A - invest a lifetime of study to become my scholarly equal then you won't have to ask someone else.

B - believe what i tell you , because i was GENEROUS enough to offer my expertise and i have ZERO possible incentive to lie

C - go fuck yourself

i don't care which.

Anonymous ID: ccabf9 Nov. 29, 2020, 1:47 a.m. No.11827029   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7051 >>7467

>>11827001

>that sent me off in the right direction…I think…

 

here's another suggestion….

pull up the MSDS (material safety data sheet) for chlorine dioxide.

that is what a newbie chemist working with chlorine dioxide for the first time would consult.

you can find them online, but IIRC, nowadays you have to pay a fee to read/download.

it's EXTREMELY nasty shit.

the newage flakes using it swear by it. what they are using is very dilute solutions.

now, IF i had terminal cancer, and IF the 5000 other alternative treatments i tried first did not work…

then, and ONLY THEN, would i consider trying it. when i had nothing left to lose. it would be at the bottom of my list, just above shoving a cactus up my ass, setting my hair on fire, and snorting battery acid.

or…. you COULD just take my word, since i have ZERO incentive to lie.

Anonymous ID: ccabf9 Nov. 29, 2020, 1:55 a.m. No.11827057   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7254

>>11827014

>Almost beat the fucking SHIT out of the "doctor" who put my dying (of old age) father on antidepressants and statins.

 

first, i am NOT a physician. i already said, i'm a chemist. retired.

second, good for you, i would do the same thing to an MD who prescribed statins or antidepressants. those are poisons.

third, BUT just because the medical profession is morally and ethically bankrupt, that does NOT automatically make "alternative" treatments any less evil.

for your own good you need to be less triggered. i know what i'm talking about, and i have no reason to lie. chlorine dioxide is BAD for you.

YES, it is a disinfectant and it will kill germs. and chemotherapy kills tumors, too. but just like chemo, chlorine dioxide is TOXIC to you, not just the germs.

i've given you true and accurate info. do with it whatever you like. you wanna poison yourself because some "alternative guru" promises you a miracle, it's your privilege.

Anonymous ID: ccabf9 Nov. 29, 2020, 2:04 a.m. No.11827092   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7143 >>7175

>>11827050

>Do you know how to write a reference?

>APA style…

>Author, year, title, publisher, city…page and paragraph numbers dont hurt either…

 

yes, i do. i've written thousands of them as references in manuscripts submitted to peer review journals. just not APA style, bc chemistry journals have their own formatting requirements.

the thing is… i don't NEED to look up any references. i KNOW what chlorine dioxide is and what it's properties are.

so i don't HAVE any references handy.

I'M not the one who wants references, so I'M not going to search the literature to find them for you.

a question was posted to this board, and being qualified to answer, i did. TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT, because that's all the work i'm going to do for you.

if me telling you to do your own research makes you angry, it's a good indication of YOUR level of intelligence, education, and maturity.

Anonymous ID: ccabf9 Nov. 29, 2020, 2:13 a.m. No.11827123   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7125

>>11827056

>do have experience in medical field…

 

good for ou , karen

now riddle me this… have you seen the devastating effects of chemotherapy?

well chemo kills tumors. does that make it a good remedy?

chlorine dioxide kills germs, just like chemo kills tumors. you wanna take it, GO RIGHT AHEAD.

i've warned you that it's EXTREMELY toxic. but if you're determined, i can't stop you.

Anonymous ID: ccabf9 Nov. 29, 2020, 2:21 a.m. No.11827148   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7152 >>7156

>>11827125

>Selenium doesn't get enough attention.

 

selenium's role in fighting diseases lies in the fact that it is the heavy metal atom at the center of some recently discovered enzymes that play a role in the immune response.

HOWEVER, selenium is VERY TOXIC. simply handling the metallic element, you can absorb it thru your skin. doing so gives you "garlick breath." not too surprising since garlic is a great natural source for selenium. but TOO MUCH taken as a supplement COULD be dangerous and toxic. regardless of what the pill pushers say, i recommend you take NO MORE than 50 MICRO-grams per day. not MILLI-grams, MICRO-grams.

Anonymous ID: ccabf9 Nov. 29, 2020, 2:26 a.m. No.11827172   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11827156

>50 micrograms is not exactly an easy titration for most people who dont have experience in dosing such small measures

 

IDk what you're on about. you can't just take an inorganic selenium salt.

i'm reccmmending a standardized supplement that provides selenium that is organically bound, from a plant or animal source.

the dose of Se will be listed on the bottle.

Anonymous ID: ccabf9 Nov. 29, 2020, 2:33 a.m. No.11827200   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11827143

>more than just wiki as that’s not reliable

 

i CHECKED the wikipedia page BEFORE i suggested it. there is NOTHING false in it, and it is BASIC enough that you MIGHT be able to comprehend some of it. enough to understand that it is HIGHLY TOXIC, and NOT to be taken internally.

but YOU can't seem to stop being a whiny little cunt because someone else won't do your work FOR you.

or else YOU are the shill/bot.

Anonymous ID: ccabf9 Nov. 29, 2020, 2:37 a.m. No.11827211   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7372

>>11827175

>Well, my mistake, I didn't realize your name was Dow

 

Dow? LMAO. if you think the name Dow means anything in the world of chemistry, then YOU are just an anon shit poster.