>>11827861

time to dig

>>11826491 pb

>reposting from night shift

Dominion Voting Sensitivity setting

Sounds like default setting is lower sensitivity which is less likely to flag ballots?

Default setting was lower in a RECOUNT of a RUNOFF than the initial election.

Because of the setting on default, Bo Hatchett recieved moar votes in RECOUNT of RUNoff

think Georgia Runoff

HAS THE SENSITIVITY SETTING GLITCH BEEN NOTICED BEFORE?

so many Dominion Glitches

so little time

Due to the settings on ballot scanning equipment being set to a lower sensitivity in the Aug. 11 General Primary Runoff Elections, Republican Bo Hatchett has picked up two Towns County votes in the District 50 State Senate race recount.The Towns County Board of Elections Office made this determination during Monday’s state-mandated race recount when a Dominion Voting Systems technician noticed the machines were not set to electronically adjudicate hand-filled provisional and absentee-by-mail ballots.A Dominion tech assigned by the Secretary of State’s Office attends each election to operate and maintain the settings on the machines, and it was unclear at press time what the default mode for active elections should be or why the machines were in a lower sensitivity during the runoff.Electronic adjudication allows a hand-filled ballot with stray marks to be kicked out –for manual adjudication by specially designated elections volunteers, who must decide how the voter meant to cast his or her ballot based on the visible markings.In the case of Hatchett’s two additional votes, adjudicators determined that the ballots in question were clearly marked in his favor, yet the sensitivity setting of the machine'''made the ballots register “no votes” in the state senate race==. All 4,131 local ballots were accounted for in the Aug. 31 recount, but the final recount result showed that, of the 3,652 Towns County votes cast in the state senate race – up by two with the different settings – Hall’s total remained at 1,878 votes to Hatchett’s updated 1,684 votes

http://townscountyherald.net/pdf/tch%2009-02-20%20Front%201.pdf

>>11828076

Meeting Minutes from January 2020 in Arizona discussing an

Electronic Adjudication 'Upgrade'

https://azsos.gov/sites/default/files/Minutes%2001-28-2020_Final_COPY.pdf

and Arapahoe Colorado discussing Electronic Adjud Voting System

Efficiencies through electronic adjudication: Currently, when a voter makes a mistake or our tabulation machines cannot determine their intent, their entire paper ballot must be manually duplicated by a team of two bipartisan judges and reprocessed by tabulation teams. Our current duplication process is to print a new paper ballot and have one judge read the voter’s selections while the second judge marks the new ballot by hand. The judges then switch roles to verify that the voter’s intent for each contest has been correctly captured on the new ballot. If a voter has over-voted an issue or race or their intent is unclear to the judges, their selection on that question is left blank. It doesn’t matter how few mistakes the voter makes on the ballot, election judges must duplicate every vote to a new paper ballot.

In the new voting system, ballots are adjudicated electronically instead of being duplicated manually.We would use Canon scanners that count the vote and capture an image of every single ballot. If the system cannot determine a voter’s intent, an image of the ballot in question will appear on a computer screen in the tabulation room. Election judges will then be able to review the ballot markings and determine the voter’s intent electronically using computer software, without ever touching the ballot. All adjudication decisions will be archived in the system for future review and transparency. It will no longer be necessary to print replacement ballots or duplicate the entire ballot if a mistake is limited to only one or two contests. This will save paper, time and money.

Auditability: Colorado law requires all counties to conduct a new form of post-election audit known as a Risk-Limiting Audit (RLA) beginning in 2017. RLAs provide a statistical assurance that contest winners actually did win the election. Arapahoe County has taken the lead in Colorado by piloting these types of audits since 2013. No existing voting system in the state is capable of conducting a RLA. Currently, RLA’s can only be completed in Colorado by obtaining a secondary voting system and scanning all voted ballots twice. This is incredibly expensive and time consuming. The new voting system can perform RLAs without needing a second scan of each ballot cast.

Financial Incentive: The Colorado Department of State has committed to cover part of the implementation and training costs for counties that move to the new voting system in 2016 or 2017. For Arapahoe County, the State will cover approximately $60,000 of these costs if we move to the new system.

>>11828134

City of Bethel Alaska

Agreement with Dominion Voting

$5000to service your election

https://www.cityofbethel.org/vertical/sites/%7B86032ACB-92B0-4505-919A-3F45B84FECD9%7D/uploads/Dominion_Voting_Systems_Inc._May_2017_through_May_3_2025.pdf

>>11828244

Potus Scavino twat

F35

305th chatter