Anonymous ID: cb5368 Nov. 29, 2020, 11:37 a.m. No.11831003   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11830778

Two takeaways:

1) It may be a case that hasn't been heard yet that is pushed on to the Supreme Court

2) There is still evidence coming in, and "by then" it will be accumulated for presenting the case. Wondering what this means - if not just more testimonies and affidavits, could it be the SERVER DATA that is inbound?

Evidence from the DNI report that can be used in Court?

Anonymous ID: cb5368 Nov. 29, 2020, 11:43 a.m. No.11831050   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11830917 Excellent graphic.

The vaccine part makes this anon nervous. If normies want to inject that shit, dunno, think it's immoral.

>>11830948

>Durham said he wouldn't release before electionโ€ฆ. well, he can now and the timing would be good.

Good point - drop the info, can't argue about the election and influencing voters as the delay any more! What, influence judges / legislature / electors? That would be a GOOD thing!