Anonymous ID: 540b60 Nov. 30, 2020, 5:13 a.m. No.11840254   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0489 >>0557

>>11840116

For me, it's the McChicken. The best fast food sandwich. I even ask for extra McChicken sauce packets and the staff is so friendly and more than willing to oblige.

 

One time I asked for McChicken sauce packets and they gave me three. I said, "Wow, three for free!" and the nice friendly McDonald's worker laughed and said, "I'm going to call you 3-for-free!".

 

Now the staff greets me with "hey it's 3-for-free!" and ALWAYS give me three packets. It's such a fun and cool atmosphere at my local McDonald's restaurant, I go there at least 3 times a week for lunch and a large iced coffee with milk instead of cream, 1-2 times for breakfast on the weekend, and maybe once for dinner when I'm in a rush but want a great meal that is affordable, fast, and can match my daily nutritional needs.

 

I even dip my fries in McChicken sauce, it's delicious! What a great restaurant.

Anonymous ID: 540b60 Nov. 30, 2020, 5:22 a.m. No.11840318   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0376 >>0377 >>0380

>>11840284

You're learning.

But I would suggest that treason does not occur to people who are taught that the institution matters above all else. Not the people. Not the words. Not the intent. But the institution. If you are taught that, psychologically ingrained, these people are not committing treason in their own minds.

Anonymous ID: 540b60 Nov. 30, 2020, 5:37 a.m. No.11840408   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0427

>>11840377

>>11840376

What I'm getting at, is that you are ultimately correct. Being a victim of psychological programming does not excuse you from miscontruing the aim and meaning of the document to which you swore an oath.

 

I'm only suggesting a realism in that if you can psychologically train an asset into believing what it does is not treason, then it is not treason in its mind. If you prioritize targets in a theatre, you go after the programmer, not the programmed.

Anonymous ID: 540b60 Nov. 30, 2020, 5:46 a.m. No.11840475   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0550

>>11840446

I have a question on this topic (above).

 

Why in a democratic Republic should it not be a common practice to have all election related hardware, firmware, and software in the public domain? This is one of the forms of technology that should be voted into open source, for the good of the Republic. Peer review, full scrutiny. NSA engineers, to BSD kernal hacking autists, on down the line. Full acountability.

 

Yes qresearch? What say you.

Anonymous ID: 540b60 Nov. 30, 2020, 5:54 a.m. No.11840550   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0582

>>11840475

>I have a question on this topic (above).

>

>Why in a democratic Republic should it not be a common practice to have all election related hardware, firmware, and software in the public domain? This is one of the forms of technology that should be voted into open source, for the good of the Republic. Peer review, full scrutiny. NSA engineers, to BSD kernal hacking autists, on down the line. Full acountability.

>

 

Still waitingโ€ฆ anyone? Who's not fake and gay?

Anonymous ID: 540b60 Nov. 30, 2020, 6:11 a.m. No.11840703   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0729

Just in case we weren't sure the board is 99% shill. There's this:

Why in a democratic Republic should it not be a common practice to have all election related hardware, firmware, and software in the public domain? This is one of the forms of technology that should be voted into open source, for the good of the Republic. Peer review, full scrutiny. NSA engineers, to BSD kernal hacking autists, on down the line. Full acountability.

 

So why isn't there a movement to implement the above?

 

Gotcha TLA's! I already just started it. Now it can't be stopped.